A
Andreas Eibach
Hi,
this would interest me a lot. As I simply do not like double work for no
obvious reason, I did a direct comparison of the old patch...
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS04-012.mspx
and the new patch
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS05-051.mspx
Clearly Microsoft states in the Security Update Information section that
especially for Win2k, MS05-051 does *NOT* replace the MS04-012 patch.
Yet I think it does.
Please take a look here. There is no file in the "old" patch which has
not been affected (updated or kept, like RPCRT4.DLL).
http://www.bilder-speicher.de/Catlaina507629.vollbild.html
So could anyone tell me why you allegedly still need MS04-012 anyway?
-Andreas
this would interest me a lot. As I simply do not like double work for no
obvious reason, I did a direct comparison of the old patch...
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS04-012.mspx
and the new patch
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS05-051.mspx
Clearly Microsoft states in the Security Update Information section that
especially for Win2k, MS05-051 does *NOT* replace the MS04-012 patch.
Yet I think it does.
Please take a look here. There is no file in the "old" patch which has
not been affected (updated or kept, like RPCRT4.DLL).
http://www.bilder-speicher.de/Catlaina507629.vollbild.html
So could anyone tell me why you allegedly still need MS04-012 anyway?
-Andreas