You definitely need to call Samaritans
--
Mike Hall
MS-MVP Windows Shell/User
Yeah, what's a few a few hundred million out of their billions and
they can
get the Chinese gov to throw anyone they want into jail ..
.. it's an interesting state of justice often referred to [by some]
as "oppression".
Mike Hall - MS MVP Windows Shell/User wrote:
I don't think that the Chinese Gov't need much coersion at all to
throw anybody into a jail..
--
Mike Hall
MS-MVP Windows Shell/User
You are missing the point though. This is not about a nicety or
customer convenience. Microsoft paid off the totalitarian
government there to throw anyone in jail who sells a new computer
without Windows on it (or some 'other' operating system).
I think you need to read a bill of rights.
Mike Hall - MS MVP Windows Shell/User wrote:
If the average person on the street were to buy a computer
without anything installed, they wouldn't have the first clue
what to do next.. neither would they particularly want to pay
full price for an OS that they then have to install
themselves, look for hardware drivers etc..
Computers are supplied ready to go, and most are grateful for
that.. OEM pre-installed software is as much as given away free
making it an even better deal..
There is no law in place that says a computer buyer can't
replace whatever is installed with something else.. so which
of the 100 or so versions of Linux would you suggest to a
prospective customer, and can they buy it at the same time as
they get the white box?
Oh yes, of course, they can download Linux, can't they.. not
on a white box devoid of any OS, they can't.. most buyers just
want a computer to work with whatever software of choice.. if
it comes with Windows, so be it..
I still think that you should call Samaritans..
--
Mike Hall
MS-MVP Windows Shell/User
message The beef is this.
If a person buys a computer, they should decide what does go
on it, not go on it, might go on it. It's up to the computer
to decide if software (if any) is to be run. Computers are
just that: computers .. reprogrammable computation machines.
Software is "speech" or "freedom of expression" and
copyrightable. It's a violation of free speech, in a sense,
to force a computer owner to sing a certain tune. Microsoft
shouldn't be paying governments to force their or any other
software onto computers.
I get the impression that people don't care about this
violation because it
is happening 'over there' to 'chinese people'? Maybe it's
just an impression.
Anyway, Microsoft is getting away with paying a totalitarian
government to throw oppressed people into prisons if they
refuse to install Windows (or some linux distro) on the
computers they sell. I thought all this business with China
was supposed to increase freedom and rights there, not to
force on the people.
I don't like it.
Richard Urban wrote:
Rights end at a certain point, do they not? It is up to the
courts to decide when that point has been crossed.
As a white box builder I can supply any operating the
customer asks for, as long as he/she pays for it. Sooo,
what's your beef?
--
Regards,
Richard Urban
Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User
(For email, remove the obvious from my address)
Quote from George Ankner:
If you knew as much as you think you know,
You would realize that you don't know what you thought you
knew!
message Are you contemptuous about others' rights generally? Or
just a racist?
Mike Hall - MS MVP Windows Shell/User wrote:
Call Samaritans..
--
Mike Hall
MS-MVP Windows Shell/User
in message
Microsoft arranged to use the power of a totalitarian
regime to force computer makers to pre-install operating
systems on computers sold.
So I suppose now there are people rotting in some
Chinese prisons, basically
because they sold computers w/o Windows (although some
might point to Linux,
it was Microsoft - not the Linux crowd - that encouraged
this "law").
For some reason I find this reprehensible and I'm not
sure why.
I can understand people getting a slap for pirating a
copy of Windows, but not for selling a PC without it.
.. Anyway..
I guess we all can agree it's amazing what can be
achieved for software when
one ha$ an oppressive regime in one'$ pocket. Even more
amazing is the stink. So much for "intellectual"
"copyright" on "freedom of speech".