Why Is It Taking So Long For M$ to destroy Linux ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Burgess Meredith
  • Start date Start date
B

Burgess Meredith

I suffered through the interminal drivel, that the Dynamic Dummies, Jim
Richardson-Man, and the Boy Blunder had to say,
same clown, different name
Click to expand...

People talk about how long it's
taking Linux to control the desktop, but
that article raises a good point.
M$ has been very successful in destroying
competition.

It killed Lotus, Ashton-Tate, Borland,
Novell, Netscape, and so on...the graveyard
in Redmond is a mile wide.

However, one grave remains unfilled, and it has
been that way for almost 5 years now.

Why hasn't M$ stopped Linux?
They threw everything at it but the
kitchen sink, and yet it comes back
stronger, better, faster, more
relevent to the user, while LoseDO$
products continue to fail and fail
and sink further away from the
mainstream.

Why has Linux continually advanced?

Why hasn't the M$ death machine been
able to kill it?

Why is Linux still such a big problem
for them and their plans of world
domination ?

Hah!
 
Why hasn't the M$ death machine been
able to kill it?

Why is Linux still such a big problem
for them and their plans of world
domination ?
Click to expand...
Three reasons:
1. Anti-trust law.
2. GPL underpinned by a potentially huge lobby group.
3. A superior and economic system.
 
Hi Burgess Meredith ,
You say : " Why has Linux continually advanced ? "


December 23 , 1999 ,
Microsoft's market value surpassed 600 billion dollars .
 
I suffered through the interminal drivel, that the Dynamic Dummies, Jeff
Relf-Man, and the Boy Blunder had to say,
Hi Burgess Meredith ,
You say : " Why has Linux continually advanced ? "


December 23 , 1999 ,
Microsoft's market value surpassed 600 billion dollars .
Click to expand...

1999? you mean before
linux destroyed microsoft?

I heard that Ashton-Tate
and Lotus were once good
buys...
 
Back
Top