A
Aluxe
Below is a simple argument for why I think Microsoft never once tested
Internet Explorer tabs for usability ... or if they had ... uh ... then I
show a very common argument for why IE7 tabs are unusable as compared to
Firefox tabs. Please confirm or deny the points in my argument so we all
benefit.
___ARGUMENT___
I have a very efficient browser-tab use model that has only one flaw with
Firefox yet which is horribly broken in IE7. It is broken so badly, I
wonder if the new Internet Explorer tabs were ever tested for usability.
AN IDIOT's BROWSER TAB USE MODEL:
- Point your browser to a link-intensive web page
(e.g., videos, executables, or, for testing purposes, point to
news.google.com but the point is graphics intensity slows down browsers).
- Control rightclick on a link ... wait for ten or fifteen seconds for the
page to load ...
- Control rightclick on the next link ... wait another ten or fifteen
seconds for the page to load ...
.... and so on ... (point is only an idiot would do this) ...
AN EXCELLENT FIREFOX BROWSER TAB USE MODEL (with only 1 flaw):
- Point Firefox to a link-intensive web page
- Control rightclick on a dozen interesting links in series
- Keep selecting and opening interesting links in the background without
waiting explicitly for the links to actually take the ten or fifteen
(sometimes twenty or more now that you're accomplishing a lot more in the
background)
- When you're good and ready, position your cursor in ONE SPOT
- Position your cursor in the rightmost x in the tab window
- Then, as you skim thru the dozens of now-loaded web pages, you keep your
cursor in the SAME spot as you close pages, one by one.
FIREFOX FLAW (feature?):
The only flaw in this Firefox extremely efficient browser tab use model is
the VERY LAST web page can't be closed with that same X. You have to
frustratingly MOVE your cursor to the top-right browser X (this is probably
by design but I prefer an option to determine whether the last x closes the
very last tab or not).
With Firefox pointed to news.google.com, I simply control-left-click on
perhaps a dozen or two dozen URLs of interest, and allow them to open in a
new tab in the background while I am selecting URLs. Then, I view the web
pages quickly, positioning my cursor on the right-most X and clicking, one
by one to close the tabs as I skim the articles.
AN UNUSABLE IE7 BROWSER TAB USE MODEL (with huge flaws):
- Guess what happens in IE7 tabs?
- If you have, say, two dozen tabs open, you practically have to move your
cursor two dozen times just to close the tabs after reading each item!
- Did Microsoft test their tabs for usability even once?
- I mean, hell, the Firefox model was already there to copy!
- In my opinion, unless you open only one or two tabs, the IE7 tab use
model is wholly unusable!
REQUEST:
Please confirm or deny whether one can close, one by one after reading
them, say a dozen or two dozen tabbed web pages (say videos or other
graphic intensive content) in Internet Explorer 7 without having to move
the mose each and every time?
Internet Explorer tabs for usability ... or if they had ... uh ... then I
show a very common argument for why IE7 tabs are unusable as compared to
Firefox tabs. Please confirm or deny the points in my argument so we all
benefit.
___ARGUMENT___
I have a very efficient browser-tab use model that has only one flaw with
Firefox yet which is horribly broken in IE7. It is broken so badly, I
wonder if the new Internet Explorer tabs were ever tested for usability.
AN IDIOT's BROWSER TAB USE MODEL:
- Point your browser to a link-intensive web page
(e.g., videos, executables, or, for testing purposes, point to
news.google.com but the point is graphics intensity slows down browsers).
- Control rightclick on a link ... wait for ten or fifteen seconds for the
page to load ...
- Control rightclick on the next link ... wait another ten or fifteen
seconds for the page to load ...
.... and so on ... (point is only an idiot would do this) ...
AN EXCELLENT FIREFOX BROWSER TAB USE MODEL (with only 1 flaw):
- Point Firefox to a link-intensive web page
- Control rightclick on a dozen interesting links in series
- Keep selecting and opening interesting links in the background without
waiting explicitly for the links to actually take the ten or fifteen
(sometimes twenty or more now that you're accomplishing a lot more in the
background)
- When you're good and ready, position your cursor in ONE SPOT
- Position your cursor in the rightmost x in the tab window
- Then, as you skim thru the dozens of now-loaded web pages, you keep your
cursor in the SAME spot as you close pages, one by one.
FIREFOX FLAW (feature?):
The only flaw in this Firefox extremely efficient browser tab use model is
the VERY LAST web page can't be closed with that same X. You have to
frustratingly MOVE your cursor to the top-right browser X (this is probably
by design but I prefer an option to determine whether the last x closes the
very last tab or not).
With Firefox pointed to news.google.com, I simply control-left-click on
perhaps a dozen or two dozen URLs of interest, and allow them to open in a
new tab in the background while I am selecting URLs. Then, I view the web
pages quickly, positioning my cursor on the right-most X and clicking, one
by one to close the tabs as I skim the articles.
AN UNUSABLE IE7 BROWSER TAB USE MODEL (with huge flaws):
- Guess what happens in IE7 tabs?
- If you have, say, two dozen tabs open, you practically have to move your
cursor two dozen times just to close the tabs after reading each item!
- Did Microsoft test their tabs for usability even once?
- I mean, hell, the Firefox model was already there to copy!
- In my opinion, unless you open only one or two tabs, the IE7 tab use
model is wholly unusable!
REQUEST:
Please confirm or deny whether one can close, one by one after reading
them, say a dozen or two dozen tabbed web pages (say videos or other
graphic intensive content) in Internet Explorer 7 without having to move
the mose each and every time?