My system is old DDR memory computer. I got 512M DDR 400hz. I don't
know if I need more memory or not. My simple question why do I need
more memory. I don't know if I can run any
faster than this. I don't play any game so I probably don't need more
memory.
It'll be overall smoother. Going from 512 to 1meg (DDR 400), I saw
some improvements (but I also updated apples and oragnes, the 533
Celeron D @2.6Ghz to a 800Mhz P4 @3Ghz). Same goes for a 2Meg DDR2
system, first time I've run over 1M mem. Smoother, quieter, only
nothing huge in the way of an impression to brag about, but as if less
were going on. I switched out any noisy fans, too, so it's the first
silence I've heard in ages, in the quiet clicking of HDs.
No, you probably don't need as much, if at a certain point, what
you'll feel. A subtler point among distinction, however, although one
discretely, irrevocably there, nevertheless, when 512M becomes 1 or
2G. Measurable speeds to a matrix of volumes that can be as little as
a 10% real-world or applied improvement. It's similar in a sense, to
say, that not everyone would notice going from perfectly working
spring shocks, on a perfectly working car, to air shocks with
adjustable, inflatable inlets. Bearing in mind, you know, we are a
nation of gear freaks, of course, amidst those whom, by in large,
first comprised an adaptation to building "garage computers" at an
American homefront of PC popularity, shortly following a regulated
demise of $4K, 6-second muscle cars.
