Why can't ms make API's somewhat compatable

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lloyd Sheen
  • Start date Start date
L

Lloyd Sheen

<rant>

In asp.net you define the datasource and do a databind to cause the contents
of a control to change. In winforms (combobox as example) I just spent a
while trying to figure out the equivalent.

Refresh - Nope
Datasource = new datasource - Nope

but

Datasource=Nothing
Datasource=new datasource - Yes

Makes no sense and is about as easy to figure out as Vista is.

</rant>

LS
 
Lloyd,

They were much more compatible, it get always the idea that (some) people
who were doing classic ASP want that behaviour.

(A kind of that (some) VB6 people want only that behaviour)

Cor
 
Cor,

I would think that a Databind method is much easier to understand than
setting the datasource to nothing and then to the source.

I think the asp way is much more logical. Setting something to nothing
while it may cause a refresh is really not very intuitive.

Thanks
Lloyd Sheen
 
Lloyd,

There is not any need to set a datasource to nothing in normal
circumstances.

This can only be as you want to show an empty grid.

Cor
 
Cor Ligthert said:
Lloyd,

There is not any need to set a datasource to nothing in normal
circumstances.

This can only be as you want to show an empty grid.

Cor
Click to expand...

On the load of the app I load a dropdown. There is a second dropdown who's
value depend on the first dropdown. When the selection in the first is
changed I rebind the second dropdown. If I do not set the datasource to
nothing and then databind the list contains the original items.

I put a little debugging code in the selectionchange event and found that
without setting the datasource to nothing I would have the datasource with a
different number of items than the number of items in the dropdown. Setting
the datasource to nothing prior to resetting the datasource fixed the
problem.

LS
 
On the load of the app I load a dropdown. There is a second dropdown who's
value depend on the first dropdown. When the selection in the first is
changed I rebind the second dropdown. If I do not set the datasource to
nothing and then databind the list contains the original items.

I put a little debugging code in the selectionchange event and found that
without setting the datasource to nothing I would have the datasource with a
different number of items than the number of items in the dropdown. Setting
the datasource to nothing prior to resetting the datasource fixed the
problem.

LS
Click to expand...

What type of object is the data source? Perhaps it doesn't implement
a notification event that would tell the control to refetch its list.
 
Jack Jackson said:
What type of object is the data source? Perhaps it doesn't implement
a notification event that would tell the control to refetch its list.
Click to expand...

Datasource is a list(of anyobject).

Problem exists for any object.

LS
 
Lloyd,

Can be a bug or whatever, however a workaround is never common behaviour.
You are talking about compatibility.

Cor
 
Datasource is a list(of anyobject).

Problem exists for any object.

LS
Click to expand...

My guess is that if you used BindingList(Of T) instead of List, the
bound control would be notified when the list changes and you wouldn't
have to rebind. BindingList implements IBindingList which supports
pushing updates both ways.
 
Jack Jackson said:
My guess is that if you used BindingList(Of T) instead of List, the
bound control would be notified when the list changes and you wouldn't
have to rebind. BindingList implements IBindingList which supports
pushing updates both ways.
Click to expand...

Ok I just tried to change the to BindingList. First off there is no
addrange, second no sort.

But lets get to what I was saying. Why are the api's for asp and win apps
different. MS is supposed to be making things easy for developers (or at
least that is the appearance they give).

Lloyd Sheen
 
Lloyd,

You are the first who calls not the method to databind something well, I
never have understood why it was only needed by aspnet.

Cor
 
Cor Ligthert said:
Lloyd,

You are the first who calls not the method to databind something well, I
never have understood why it was only needed by aspnet.

Cor
Click to expand...

Cor,

My concern is not whether either is correct. It is because MS does not
seem to understand or care that having different sets of API's for
essentially the same operation goes against everything they preach. Look at
the various connections, dataadapters etc. Since they "implement" they are
forced to have a common interface. Why MS could not do something similar
with databinding is beyond me.

Lloyd
 
Back
Top