Good to know. I've bought mice, keyboards, PCI cards from them. They work-
they're cheap. Power supplies and motherboards (not that they do
motherboards) - not so sure if cheap is the right way to go.
More important than reputation are the numbers. Responsible
manufacturers can provide a full sheet of numeric specifications that
all power supplies must meet. To forget some essential functions, a
power supply manufacturer will not provide those specs. And then
those who would actually identify the supply as defective have no
numbers - must remain silent.
Without specs, those who actually know power supplies remain
silent. Then the inferior supply can be recommended by those who only
understand watts. A reputation without numeric spec sheets suggests
recommendations without facts.
An example. Most every computer consumes less than 200 watts.
Therefore we install a 350 watt supply - more than sufficient.
However, power supplies sold on myths and without specs may rate the
equivalent supply at 500 watts. No, they did not lie. Used different
numbers since they are marketing to computer assemblers; not to those
with electrical knowledge. Then when the 500 watt supply was
undersized on one voltage, a computer assemblers instead hypes a need
for 700 watt supplies. Notice how may hype 700 watt supplies rather
than discuss current for each voltage. A supply is sized by current
for each voltage - not watts.
Better supplies come with a long list of numeric specifications.
Any minimally sufficient supply starts at $60 retail. Nothing here
says numeric specs and $60 means the supply is sufficient. Post are
two factors that any acceptable supply must meet.
Some examples that any minimally acceptable supply will claim to
meet: