C
Crirus
Any ideea?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
O
One Handed Man [ OHM# ]
C
Crirus
Some speculation about framework size?
O
One Handed Man [ OHM# ]
Sorry, dont know, would expect it to be larger though.
OHM
OHM
H
Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]
* "Crirus said:Some speculation about framework size?
*Is there nothing else to worry about?*
C
Crirus
I'm worryed about this too because I count on smaller size possible for a
internet application
If I design a 300 K client and Framework is 50 M is bad enough.. I force
every client to download such a huge app with a dial up
internet application
If I design a 300 K client and Framework is 50 M is bad enough.. I force
every client to download such a huge app with a dial up
H
Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]
* "Crirus said:I'm worryed about this too because I count on smaller size possible for a
internet application
If I design a 300 K client and Framework is 50 M is bad enough.. I force
every client to download such a huge app with a dial up
I am pretty sure the next version of the Fx won't be smaller...
J
Jay B. Harlow [MVP - Outlook]
Crirus,
Considering all the features that are being added I would not expect the Fx
itself to be smaller.
Whether MS is working on finding a "lighter" method of deploying .NET apps
over the internet I'm not sure. I'm not sure what the viability of ah
"lighter" method would be. I know they have the "one click" however that
still installs the complete framework.
If you haven't you may want to consider submitting a request to have a
"lighter" method at http://register.microsoft.com/mswish/suggestion.asp, my
concern is "one click" is the "lighter" method...
Hope this helps
Jay
Considering all the features that are being added I would not expect the Fx
itself to be smaller.
Whether MS is working on finding a "lighter" method of deploying .NET apps
over the internet I'm not sure. I'm not sure what the viability of ah
"lighter" method would be. I know they have the "one click" however that
still installs the complete framework.
If you haven't you may want to consider submitting a request to have a
"lighter" method at http://register.microsoft.com/mswish/suggestion.asp, my
concern is "one click" is the "lighter" method...
Hope this helps
Jay
Crirus said:I'm worryed about this too because I count on smaller size possible for a
internet application
If I design a 300 K client and Framework is 50 M is bad enough.. I force
every client to download such a huge app with a dial up
C
Chris Dunaway
Some speculation about framework size?
You probably already have this link, but check out the reference section on
the left to get an idea about the new framework.
http://longhorn.msdn.microsoft.com/