J
Jason Shohet
I spent many frustrating days getting strong-typed data-access to work with
ASP.NET and ultimately gave up on it. It seemed also that all the pro's
thought it was a pain in the *SS, and not many used it. Make a change to a
field in the database, and all your stuff is messed up. You have to go back
in to the wizards etc and redo it all.
I'm wondering if I should also avoid strong-typed in ASP.NET 2.0, just
stick with coding datasources in code-behinds and forget all the
configuration wizards etc? I haven't fooled around with 2.0 yet but i was
wondering what you all think....
TY
Jason Shohet
ASP.NET and ultimately gave up on it. It seemed also that all the pro's
thought it was a pain in the *SS, and not many used it. Make a change to a
field in the database, and all your stuff is messed up. You have to go back
in to the wizards etc and redo it all.
I'm wondering if I should also avoid strong-typed in ASP.NET 2.0, just
stick with coding datasources in code-behinds and forget all the
configuration wizards etc? I haven't fooled around with 2.0 yet but i was
wondering what you all think....
TY
Jason Shohet