TheKeith said:
well, I'm finally ready to build a new computer after not having built
one since 2001. I'm a bit behind on all the latest hardware and
confused about what to get. I'm pretty much settled on a p4 3+ GHz,
but don't know whether to go with the new 775 socket with one of the
intel 9xx chipsets or one of the older 875 chipsets with the 478
socket. I've been reading some about the differences and how the 9xx
chipsets don't really offer any practical performance improvements
for the time, but still I can't see getting an older technology when
I don't have to worry at all about backward-compatibility. All
hardware including the HD, will be purchased new.
Well, the only real advantage of the new 9xx series chipsets is that they do
PCI-Express. Whether to get Socket 775 vs. 478, I'd say that normally it
would matter for upgrade purposes in the future. But frankly, I don't see
much long-term future left for the entire Pentium 4 series anymore. Intel is
in major trouble right now, because it can't dig anymore speed out of its
Pentium 4 anymore. It's been plagued with many fiascos, one after another
for the last several months.
First, it had to recall the brand new 9xx-series chipsets within days of
introducing it, because of a production flaw. Then it cancelled a
highly-publicized future Wi-Fi feature in the 9xx chipsets, which it had
previously announced with much fanfare. Then it announced that it was going
to increase the speed of its FSB from 800Mhz to 1066Mhz, but now it looks
like it's having a lot of trouble producing enough of those chips. It
announced that it would introduce a 4.0Ghz P4 by sometime earlier this year,
then later it said it would delay it to the end of the year, and now it's
completely cancelled that chip altogether. It may be even possible that the
next Intel processor will not be based on the Pentium 4, but on its mobile
Pentium-M processor (transferred over to the desktop). The Pentium-M
typically runs in the speed range of 1.7 to 2.2Ghz, right now. So you might
find yourself trading in a 3.6Ghz processor for a 2.5Ghz processor in the
future.
The highest speed Socket 478 processor is a 3.2Ghz part. The highest speed
Socket 775 may not be all that much higher, maybe at most 3.6Ghz for the
next several years. So you're not losing much speed sticking with Socket 478
if that's what you want. PCI-Express is still not all that popular yet.
Can someone explain what this pci max (I think it's called) is all
about? Is it supposed to compete with AGP or something? Thanks.
You mean PCI Express? Yes, it's supposed to be a replacement for both PCI
and AGP. With PCIe you can have different kinds of slots, which they call 1X
slots for normal peripherals and 16X slots for video cards. The 1X slots are
about as fast as old-school PCI, except the bandwidth is not shared with
other slots, so the whole bandwidth belongs to each of the slots. The 16X is
supposedly about 4 times the bandwidth of AGP.
Most of the video cards that you can get for PCIe have shown precisely zero
improvement over their own AGP versions, in fact, you might find a few
tenths of a percentage /lower/ performance. That's because video to system
memory performance is a red-herring -- completely useless, nobody uses
system memory for video memory unless you have an integrated graphics
motherboard. So it made no difference whether you had a 1X, 2X, 4X or 8X AGP
slot, that particular feature was never used. And similarly, it'll never be
used in the newer PCIe slots.
However, one feature that might be useful in the future about PCIe is the
ability to use multiple high-speed 16X slots to have dual-video cards which
will double the performance of your video by sharing rendering duties.
Yousuf Khan