I don't know if there are drivers for the 9950F for Windows 7. I
am using Windows XP.
The 9950F came with Abbyy's Finereader OCR, but like I mentioned
above, it's pretty much worthless, as is Omnipage Pro.
I have used both of these OCRs over the years, and I admit that I
used them very infrequently, but when I did, the results were so bad
that they were useless. When the page had a picture or chart on it,
the OCR software gave a result that was unrecognizable. The picture
or charts were incomprehensible, and the text had so many errors, that
it wasn't worth it to correct them. It was quicker to just type the
text myself.
I'd like to sit with someone and see how any brand of OCR works
for them, then show them how it works for me, then compare notes.
I got so disgusted with them that I uninstalled them from my
computer. I don't even know where the install CDs are anymore, and I
don't care. They were a total waste of money.
Talker
Talker,
I find a LOT of difference depending on how I use the program (mostly,
I'm using Omnipage Pro v 14, but I've used various versions over the
last 10 years). If you just use the "default" setting, results depend
a lot on what you throw at it. A scanned typewritten page, for
example, will OCR with very few errors.... usually none. Scanned
newsprint can also do well, if it's not old and wrinkled. If there are
any images included, however, you need to depart from the default
setting and actually define the zones that are text and the zones that
are images. If you take the time to do that, resluts can be very good.
In other words, OCR is not an automatic process. It takes a lot of
human interface to get a good job.
I'd be willing to do a few tests with you. Just send me a scanned page
and I'll run it through the OCR process, and let you see how it comes
out. If interested, send the image file to charliehoffp at yahoo dot
com. Make the file an uncompressed tif, scanned at 300 ppi. Grayscale
probably best.... I'll adjust that if needed and send a copy of the
adjusted image back to you.