J
Jain
Can anyone start the debate on topic
Which is the best Antispyware
jain
Which is the best Antispyware
jain
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
E
Engel
Do you own research, and decide wich one have Real Time
Protection.
Protection.
I
Ira
If you are looking for just one to replace many it doesn't really pay. My
own opinion is that there is no one that will do thay. There are several
that are good and each one catches things that others don't. I recommend
the following-----Spybot S&D, Ewido,PCcillin 2006, AdAware and last but not
least MSAS. If you schedule them to run scans at a time that you are not
using your PC usually after 2400 you can use any or all of them,
Ira
: Can anyone start the debate on topic
: Which is the best Antispyware
: jain
:
:
own opinion is that there is no one that will do thay. There are several
that are good and each one catches things that others don't. I recommend
the following-----Spybot S&D, Ewido,PCcillin 2006, AdAware and last but not
least MSAS. If you schedule them to run scans at a time that you are not
using your PC usually after 2400 you can use any or all of them,
Ira
: Can anyone start the debate on topic
: Which is the best Antispyware
: jain
:
:
A
Antoninus Pius
That is what I do: MSAS, Spybot 1.4 (with Tea Timer), SpySweeper 4, and NAV
2005 (soon to be replaced) all run separate scans in the wee hours of each
day. HostsMan, BHO Demon and NPF 2005 (also soon to be replaced) and Tea
Timer are resident in the System Tray. Paranoia on the Web pays. No
conflicts have been noted in the months that I have been doing the Wee Hour
Scans (WHS).
2005 (soon to be replaced) all run separate scans in the wee hours of each
day. HostsMan, BHO Demon and NPF 2005 (also soon to be replaced) and Tea
Timer are resident in the System Tray. Paranoia on the Web pays. No
conflicts have been noted in the months that I have been doing the Wee Hour
Scans (WHS).
P
peruser
Most hard drives can be defragmented in less time than it
takes to sufficiently scan for spyware. The "wee hours"
of most production hard drives are already consumed with
other business including virus et.al. elimination,
defrag, data sync... the list grows.
takes to sufficiently scan for spyware. The "wee hours"
of most production hard drives are already consumed with
other business including virus et.al. elimination,
defrag, data sync... the list grows.
R
Ron Chamberlin
Jain,
You started the debate, so what are your thoughts?
I vote for using the programs that you feel protect you and that you are
most comfortable driving.
Ron Chamberlin
MS-MVP
You started the debate, so what are your thoughts?
I vote for using the programs that you feel protect you and that you are
most comfortable driving.
Ron Chamberlin
MS-MVP
B
Brain
I have used all of the below and have found that MSAS
catch's a lot more than most others. It is capable of
removing some that NAV 2005 was not able to completely
remove. However, like the other replies state, it is
benificial to use multiple spyware programs to insure
that all spyware is being detected and eliminated.
catch's a lot more than most others. It is capable of
removing some that NAV 2005 was not able to completely
remove. However, like the other replies state, it is
benificial to use multiple spyware programs to insure
that all spyware is being detected and eliminated.