S
Shawn Barnhart
I'm looking to build a PC around a P4-3.2Ghz CPU. It's not entirely clear
to me if I should avoid the Prescotts or not, but what is confusing me is
which Asus board is right.
They both appear to have nearly identical features, with the biggest
differences I can see being the 8 channel audio on the P4P, the Intel
dedicated bus network adapter on the P4C and the P4P being about $50
cheaper.
Should I care which board I choose? I'm kind of inclined to go for the P4C
one as it appears to be a higher-end board, but I'm not sure it will really
matter all that much. My primary use will be video editing and DVD
mastering, with a little FPS gaming thrown in on top, and both boards seem
more than sufficient for that. I'm not inclined to overclock or the more
nuanced bleeding edge of performance, either.
I am getting some advice from others to avoid the P4s and instead buy an AMD
Athlon 64 CPU. The general advice is that socket 478 is end-of-the-line,
and that by going with a socket 939 or 940 board I can get comperable CPU
now and a much better CPU in the near future when stuff like the Athlon 64
3800+ comes down in price.
I'm not totally swayed, though, since the P4-3.2 appears to be roughly equal
with the 3400+, which is ~$120 more than the P4-3.2. Buying a 3200+ now for
$280 and then buying another CPU later is just twice as expensive.
Thanks for any input or suggestions, especially with regards to the two P4
motherboards.
to me if I should avoid the Prescotts or not, but what is confusing me is
which Asus board is right.
They both appear to have nearly identical features, with the biggest
differences I can see being the 8 channel audio on the P4P, the Intel
dedicated bus network adapter on the P4C and the P4P being about $50
cheaper.
Should I care which board I choose? I'm kind of inclined to go for the P4C
one as it appears to be a higher-end board, but I'm not sure it will really
matter all that much. My primary use will be video editing and DVD
mastering, with a little FPS gaming thrown in on top, and both boards seem
more than sufficient for that. I'm not inclined to overclock or the more
nuanced bleeding edge of performance, either.
I am getting some advice from others to avoid the P4s and instead buy an AMD
Athlon 64 CPU. The general advice is that socket 478 is end-of-the-line,
and that by going with a socket 939 or 940 board I can get comperable CPU
now and a much better CPU in the near future when stuff like the Athlon 64
3800+ comes down in price.
I'm not totally swayed, though, since the P4-3.2 appears to be roughly equal
with the 3400+, which is ~$120 more than the P4-3.2. Buying a 3200+ now for
$280 and then buying another CPU later is just twice as expensive.
Thanks for any input or suggestions, especially with regards to the two P4
motherboards.