C
Charles
I want to win in the 3-digit PCSO suertres lotto. Along this desire, I want
to know the matrix system for this game.
to know the matrix system for this game.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
M
Mike Painter
Charles said:I want to win in the 3-digit PCSO suertres lotto. Along this desire,
I want to know the matrix system for this game.
The normal price for this information is $49.95.
BUT WAIT
A payment received within the next hour is available for only $99.95.
This will include a 100% guaranteed method of winning *every* time you play.
You may not make a profit, but you will win.
J
John W. Vinson
I want to win in the 3-digit PCSO suertres lotto. Along this desire, I want
to know the matrix system for this game.
Ummm... a couple of points.
This is a volunteer-staffed technical support forum for Microsoft Access
database programming. I doubt that this lotto uses Microsoft Access.
And secondly, if it's an honest lottery, there is *NO* way to trick it or
program around it to get a winner. Random numbers are random; if the lottery
is random then you cannot predict future draws; if it isn't random, then it's
fraudulent and illegal.
J
John W. Vinson
The normal price for this information is $49.95.
BUT WAIT
A payment received within the next hour is available for only $99.95.
This will include a 100% guaranteed method of winning *every* time you play.
You may not make a profit, but you will win.
ROFL!!!!
"But if you send your bank account number, logon password and mother's maiden
name, we'll deposit the winnings directly to your account..."
T
Tony Toews [MVP]
John W. Vinson said:And secondly, if it's an honest lottery, there is *NO* way to trick it or
program around it to get a winner. Random numbers are random; if the lottery
is random then you cannot predict future draws; if it isn't random, then it's
fraudulent and illegal.
Don't confuse people with math and statistics.
Tony (who took a stats course in university)
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Tony's Main MS Access pages - http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm
Tony's Microsoft Access Blog - http://msmvps.com/blogs/access/
For a convenient utility to keep your users FEs and other files
updated see http://www.autofeupdater.com/
Granite Fleet Manager http://www.granitefleet.com/
J
John W. Vinson
Don't confuse people with math and statistics.
Tony (who took a stats course in university)
I've tried to persuade people who play the state lottery that they'd do just
as well to give me $1.00 every day, and I'll give them $0.50 back. Haven't had
any of them take the deal though!
S
Stuart McCall
John W. Vinson said:I've tried to persuade people who play the state lottery that they'd do
just
as well to give me $1.00 every day, and I'll give them $0.50 back. Haven't
had
any of them take the deal though!
A lottery is a tax on the mathematically-challenged.
M
Mike Painter
John said:I've tried to persuade people who play the state lottery that they'd
do just as well to give me $1.00 every day, and I'll give them $0.50
back. Haven't had any of them take the deal though!
I show pwoplw my home lottery kit.
Take a crumpled dollar bill and spend a good bit of time smoothing it out in
a theatrical manner.
Then hold it in front of your face and stare intently at it for a few
seconds.
Rapidly crumple it into a ball and toss it over your shoulder.
Even the ones that play realize how true it is.
J
Jack Leach
And the absoulte worst? These people stand in line at convenience stores at
lunchtime tapping their fingers going "which one's do I want...." while half
the people behind them would like to brain them...
Lottery isn't just for the mathematically challenged!!
--
Jack Leach
www.tristatemachine.com
"I haven''t failed, I''ve found ten thousand ways that don''t work."
-Thomas Edison (1847-1931)
lunchtime tapping their fingers going "which one's do I want...." while half
the people behind them would like to brain them...
Lottery isn't just for the mathematically challenged!!
--
Jack Leach
www.tristatemachine.com
"I haven''t failed, I''ve found ten thousand ways that don''t work."
-Thomas Edison (1847-1931)
J
johnlute
At the risk of further snickering - I've actually created an Access
lottery database. Say what you will - believe what you want - the
numbers that it generates don't lie.
I haven't won the jackpot - yet - however my database has DECREASED my
odds. Laugh if you want! Lotteries are *supposed* to be "random"
however there are definite and predictable patterns. Sorry to burst
your collective bubble!
lottery database. Say what you will - believe what you want - the
numbers that it generates don't lie.
I haven't won the jackpot - yet - however my database has DECREASED my
odds. Laugh if you want! Lotteries are *supposed* to be "random"
however there are definite and predictable patterns. Sorry to burst
your collective bubble!
M
Mike Painter
johnlute said:At the risk of further snickering - I've actually created an Access
lottery database. Say what you will - believe what you want - the
numbers that it generates don't lie.
I haven't won the jackpot - yet - however my database has DECREASED my
odds. Laugh if you want! Lotteries are *supposed* to be "random"
however there are definite and predictable patterns. Sorry to burst
your collective bubble!
Man can find patterns in anything and a truly random method would be
expected to have patterns.
Without the math and a definition of these "patterns" a claim that you can
produce predictable patterns is just a claim.
J
johnlute
johnlutewrote:
Man can find patterns in anything and a truly random method would be
expected to have patterns.
Without the math and a definition of these "patterns" a claim that you can
produce predictable patterns is just a claim.
If you say so!
M
Mike Painter
johnlute said:If you say so!
I do, math and science does.
Neither of them are done in secret.
Present your work.
J
johnlute
I do, math and science does.
If you have all the answers as you say you do then what could you
possibly gain from me spelling out my work? I'm certain not to provide
you with anything enlightening!
My bigger concern is that someone might gather enough from my post to
rip-off and sell via some scam/sham website as the latest "system".
I'll just keep it to myself.
If it's of any interest I will say that with my approach I
consistently pick 3 out of 5 numbers in the Ohio Mega MIL with a 5-10
dollar wager.
Neither of them are done in secret.
Present your work.
If you have all the answers as you say you do then what could you
possibly gain from me spelling out my work? I'm certain not to provide
you with anything enlightening!
My bigger concern is that someone might gather enough from my post to
rip-off and sell via some scam/sham website as the latest "system".
I'll just keep it to myself.
If it's of any interest I will say that with my approach I
consistently pick 3 out of 5 numbers in the Ohio Mega MIL with a 5-10
dollar wager.
M
Mike Painter
johnlute said:If you have all the answers as you say you do then what could you
possibly gain from me spelling out my work? I'm certain not to provide
you with anything enlightening!
My bigger concern is that someone might gather enough from my post to
rip-off and sell via some scam/sham website as the latest "system".
I'll just keep it to myself.
If it's of any interest I will say that with my approach I
consistently pick 3 out of 5 numbers in the Ohio Mega MIL with a 5-10
dollar wager.
From the web site:
(D)(3)" For each ticket bearing a selection which matches three of the five
numbers drawn for field one, and no matching number drawn for field two, the
player shall be entitled to a regular prize award of seven dollars;"
http://www.ohiolottery.com/games/rules/mega_millions.html
Since you can play the five to ten dollars on one card, your "system"
matches what would be expected from a random selection. Pretty much what
they want you to believe.
J
johnlute
So you really don't want to know - you just want to further ridicule.
That's what I thought.
Right. So I typically win back just about what I wager.
What???
The chances of picking 3 out of 5 is EXACTLY 1 in 306. So you'd need
to play AT LEAST $306 auto lottos in order to "assure" at least ONE
winning pick of 3 out of 5.
I get 3 out of 5 regularly with 5-10 dollars. Do the math. My approach
decreased my wager from $306 to about $10.
Like I said - believe and ridicule whatever you want.
That's what I thought.
From the web site:
(D)(3)" For each ticket bearing a selection which matches three of the five
numbers drawn for field one, and no matching number drawn for field two, the
player shall be entitled to a regular prize award of seven dollars;"http://www.ohiolottery.com/games/rules/mega_millions.html
Right. So I typically win back just about what I wager.
Since you can play the five to ten dollars on one card, your "system"
matches what would be expected from a random selection.
What???
The chances of picking 3 out of 5 is EXACTLY 1 in 306. So you'd need
to play AT LEAST $306 auto lottos in order to "assure" at least ONE
winning pick of 3 out of 5.
I get 3 out of 5 regularly with 5-10 dollars. Do the math. My approach
decreased my wager from $306 to about $10.
Like I said - believe and ridicule whatever you want.
J
johnlute
So you really don't want to know - you just want to further ridicule.
That's what I thought.
Right. So I typically win back just about what I wager.
What???
The chances of picking 3 out of 5 is EXACTLY 1 in 306. So you'd need
to play AT LEAST $306 auto lottos in order to "assure" at least ONE
winning pick of 3 out of 5.
I get 3 out of 5 regularly with 5-10 dollars. Do the math. My approach
decreased my wager from $306 to about $10.
Like I said - believe and ridicule whatever you want.
I just want to clarify in case this was mis-read that I've NEVER, EVER
played $306. I've historically played 5-10 dollars. Prior to my
approach I rarely got ONE number - particularly when using the auto
lotto. People where I work put more than $100 into a pool and
SOMETIMES get a 3 out of 5 winner.
My point is that the ACTUAL odds are 1 in 306 and that with my
approach my odds are down to 1 in 10.
M
Mike Painter
BruceM said:You made an outrageous claim, and now you refuse to back it up. What
would you think if somebody told you they had found a way to beat the
system, but offered nothing further? You probably would suspect a
scam in the making.
This is my last comment.
His reaction is typical of mosat who make such claims.
Since he claims to have something that defies math and science he *should*
publish his results, then apply to Randi for the money.
Granted it's only a million but he would not have to buy a ticket.
J
johnlute
This is my last comment.
His reaction is typical of mosat who make such claims.
Since he claims to have something that defies math and science he *should*
publish his results, then apply to Randi for the money.
Granted it's only a million but he would not have to buy a ticket.
Last comment? Good! Just who do you think you're talking to? Excuse me
but I haven't made any outrageous claims. You just happen to think you
know it all therefore anything that's contrary to your academia is
labeled outrageous.
THAT is what's more outrageous than anything I've stated here.
I gave CLEAR reasons why I would NOT reveal my methods. PRECISELY to
avoid JERKS who would use it to abuse and take advantage of others. I
use my method strictly for ME, MYSELF, and I. How dare you even
SUGGEST that I'm "typical of most who make such claims".
BTW I'm an ex-magician and HUGE fan of Randi and have followed him for
YEARS. I don't blow on phonebook pages while claiming to flip them
with my mind. I've merely put together a SIMPLE "system" based off
fundamental statistical observations. I've sold this to NO ONE so I
doubt that Randi would be interested as his preference is busting
those who abuse the unsuspecting.
You're barking up the wrong tree.
J
johnlute
You made an outrageous claim, and now you refuse to back it up. What would
you think if somebody told you they had found a way to beat the system, but
offered nothing further? You probably would suspect a scam in the making.
Bruce, I made my reasons clear why I would offer nothing further.
Charles posted a question. I don't know what his intentions were but
his post was met with absolute ridicule and sarcasm. I felt compelled
to post what I did in response to that ridicule.