when you guys have a solution for _ALL_ of those scenarios is when I stop

  • Thread starter Thread starter susiedba
  • Start date Start date
S

susiedba

when you guys have a solution for _ALL_ of those scenarios is when I
stop

VB 2005 doesn't support code reuse or portability

I want to know what I am supposed to do.. am I really still supposed
to cart around _TWO_ ide so that I can write VB6 scripts and test
them; and then rewrite them into VbScript?

and then I can take my VbScript code and paste it into Vb 2005 and
REWRITE IT _AGAIN_

WHAT THE **** IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE?
 
I agree Susie, it is time to make a stand.

I urge Microsoft to undo these past 5 years and start taking VB
seriously again.

for starters, name the next version 'B #' as in BEE SHARP.
and bring back VB COM
 
The solution is for you to get over what you can't change and move on,
Aaron. I feel quite sorry for you.

Robin S.
 
I don't need to move on.

My VB6 still works in 4 times as many places as your stupid visual
fred

and I don't need to 'program' in order to be entirely successful.

I'll keep with my database stuff and move all my clients to mySql /
PHP

-Aaron
 
Robin

I feel bad for you, you're the dipshit that is following the other
lambs into the slaughter

MICROSOFT KILLED VB ONCE DO YOU HONESTLY TRUST THEM TO NOT INVENT
VISUAL FRED AGAIN?

-Susie
 
what I need to do is go and be a computer science professor so that I
can warn these kids to not trust Microsoft, they killed a language.
I'm not talking about _DAMAGING_ a language-- I am talking about
killing a language.

UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT SEXY
UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT _NECESSARY_
 
I don't need to move on.

My VB6 still works in 4 times as many places as your stupid visual
fred
Click to expand...

I don't agree with that. Anyway, wait a couple of years, and you'll be
*really* screwed, when it doesn't run on whatever comes after Vista.
and I don't need to 'program' in order to be entirely successful.
Click to expand...

The same could be said of Warren Buffett. But he's good at *something*.
I'll keep with my database stuff and move all my clients to mySql /
PHP
Click to expand...

Good luck with that.

Robin S.
Ts'i mahnu uterna ot twan ot geifur hingts uto.
 
Robin

I feel bad for you, you're the dipshit that is following the other
lambs into the slaughter

MICROSOFT KILLED VB ONCE DO YOU HONESTLY TRUST THEM TO NOT INVENT
VISUAL FRED AGAIN?

-Susie
Click to expand...

I don't care if they do. I'll adapt and continue being successful at making
my customers happy.

Robin S.
Ts'i mahnu uterna ot twan ot geifur hingts uto.
 
yeah but when you need to give them a $50,000 quote to make their apps
work in .NET?

it's just not practical
 
Susie / Aaron / Tom

thank you for standing up for what is right.

I think that you should be Sr Management at Microsoft

I know I'm not scared of a couple of 4-letter words and some capital
letters

-Larry
 
Robin

sorry, bitch, VB 2002, VB 2003 and VB 2005 DO NOT WORK ON VISTA, SO
POO ON YOU

'oh but wait the version _AFTER_ vista'

what in 2020?

-Susie
 
you do not agree with me?

let me count

SQL Server 2000
SQL Server 2005
Access
Excel
Project
Word
Visio
Outlook
Windows Script Host
ASP
DHTML

and let me count how many places that VB 2005 works

uh
desktops _WITH_ the right version of the framework (in other words,
about 3% of desktops worldwide) that do not run Vista? (BECAUSE
NOTHING DOTNET RUNS ON VISTA, RIGHT??)




ROFL

looks to me like it is a _DOTLOT_ less than 1/4, huh?
 
Larry Linson schreef:
Susie / Aaron / Tom

thank you for standing up for what is right.

I think that you should be Sr Management at Microsoft

I know I'm not scared of a couple of 4-letter words and some capital
letters

-Larry
Click to expand...

You're agreeing with your other 3 aliases. How cute. And don't say that
it's not true, because the headers betray you.

Rinze van Huizen
C-Services Holland b.v
 
aaron said:
desktops _WITH_ the right version of the framework (in other words,
about 3% of desktops worldwide) that do not run Vista? (BECAUSE
NOTHING DOTNET RUNS ON VISTA, RIGHT??)
Click to expand...

wrong, our vb2005 app runs just fine on vista
wrong, our vb2005 app runs just fine on vista
wrong, our vb2005 app runs just fine on vista
wrong, our vb2005 app runs just fine on vista
wrong, our vb2005 app runs just fine on vista


See I can say stuff 5 times too.
 
maybe we all use AOL and we have a dialup account

eat a dick and stay on-topic, fag

if I wanted your opinion; I'd send a couple of panzers over
 
I DISAGREE FAG

DOES NOT RUN ON VISTA

2002,2003 DOES NOT RUN ON VISTA

GLAD TO SEE THAT THEY PULLED A VISUAL FRED AGAIN

ROFL
 
and please buddy; please tell me what percentage of DESKTOPS have the
framework on them?

thanks
 
That is of no importance. It's on the CD they get when they buy the
program. Just as they need to install stuff for VB6 when they buy one
of our programs written in VB6. That's also not just 1 executable. The
only difference is, is that the .NET framework is a few MB's larger.


(e-mail address removed) schreef:
 
(e-mail address removed) schreef:
I DISAGREE FAG

DOES NOT RUN ON VISTA

2002,2003 DOES NOT RUN ON VISTA

GLAD TO SEE THAT THEY PULLED A VISUAL FRED AGAIN

ROFL
Click to expand...

You can disagree all you want. It's a fact that our program works just
fine on our Vista Enterprise computer.
 
(e-mail address removed) schreef:
maybe we all use AOL and we have a dialup account

eat a dick and stay on-topic, fag

if I wanted your opinion; I'd send a couple of panzers over
Click to expand...

Right, and you all just happen to get the exact same IP address every
time you dialup. Give it up. Oh and panzers.. that's a different country.
 
Back
Top