J
JM
What are some standards, benchmarks, or rules for determining when another
server is needed? I realize it's not a clear-cut issue, and an infinite
number of circumstances come into play, but I'm just looking for some
general direction.
In one particular case, this is the hardware:
Dell PowerEdge server, ~2ghz Xeon cpu, 1gb RAM
Win2k Server, SP4
3 Seagate Cheetah HDs, 40gb, RAID level 5
Benchmark DLT Tape drive
The network supports approximately 15 workstations.
This server acts as the DC and runs the primary enterprise app - a medical
billing s/w.
It also runs SQL, Veritas backup, and Symantec security (Client Security
3.0, I think)
Two users connect via TS.
There are no speed problems, and normally the system uses about half the
RAM. The only ongoing issue is the print spooler sometimes gets huge, and I
have to stop/start it. I just became aware of this, and I think it might be
related to the TS settings.
If there were more workstations, I would want a dedicated DC, but in this
case the server's multi-tasking doesn't appear to be hurting the
performance. But, should we be thinking of another server?
thank you,
jm
server is needed? I realize it's not a clear-cut issue, and an infinite
number of circumstances come into play, but I'm just looking for some
general direction.
In one particular case, this is the hardware:
Dell PowerEdge server, ~2ghz Xeon cpu, 1gb RAM
Win2k Server, SP4
3 Seagate Cheetah HDs, 40gb, RAID level 5
Benchmark DLT Tape drive
The network supports approximately 15 workstations.
This server acts as the DC and runs the primary enterprise app - a medical
billing s/w.
It also runs SQL, Veritas backup, and Symantec security (Client Security
3.0, I think)
Two users connect via TS.
There are no speed problems, and normally the system uses about half the
RAM. The only ongoing issue is the print spooler sometimes gets huge, and I
have to stop/start it. I just became aware of this, and I think it might be
related to the TS settings.
If there were more workstations, I would want a dedicated DC, but in this
case the server's multi-tasking doesn't appear to be hurting the
performance. But, should we be thinking of another server?
thank you,
jm