if not are they any good ? or are there better alternatives ?
On Picasa2...
Here's an interesting blog, some yays, some nays:
<
http://google.weblogsinc.com/entry/4855307085341518>
"Downloaded Picasa and installed. Biggest mistake ever. Computer
trashed with SpyWare and AdWare."
"...as soon as I downloaded Picassa, I was bombarded with VX2 and
IEPlugin adware/spyware, and every time I would restart my PC after
cleaning it would reapear. It wasn't until I removed Picassa that I
finally had a clean PC."
"Spyware?
I downloaded and tried Picasa, and was unfavorably impressed. The thing
requires admin priviledges to run, and immediately picked up the
pictures in another account...
.... definite privacy risk."
"Just noticed 15 attemps in my firewall log over the course of 12
minutes of this program trying to connect to share1.picasa.net [on
alternate IP addresses too], from a machine that has been idle for 12
hours. I don't consider this sort of activity "checking for software
updates". Off it comes."
"Spyware!
Several components of Picasa attempted to connect to the intenet and
were reported by ZoneAlarm. I let them have access (trusting Google -
don't they have a slogan about making money ethically?). Within hours I
had 16 incoming hits on my webserver from 66.249.65.196 and
66.249.66.109 from a bot identified as "Mediapartners-Google/2.1".
This is very suspicious because my web site is running on a non-
standard port (how did google get the port number?) and every page on
the site has --meta name="robots" content="none, noindex, noarchive,
nofollow"-- in the page header. My web site has been up for two years
and I have never had a bot hit before - that's why I am running on a
non-standard port, I don't want any."
etc etc...
Whether it's a good prog or spyware etc, I don't know, I'm not about to
find out. However the link above shows several reports of mal type
intrusions because of installing Picasa2. It's not an isolated
incident.