S
Stuart Goss
Microsoft Antispyware gives a false positive report
concerning my present IE 6.0 browser default home page
which is
http://dslstart.verizon.net/vzn.dsl/welcome.htm?ver=23290&
This page was set by my ISP Veizon DSL.
Since Verizon DSL and MSN are in collaboration to provide
software for Verizon DSL my ISP, I am sure this situation
is going to make Verizon feel decidedly warm and fuzzy
about Microsoft.
The issue of setting only Microsoft pages as default
browser restore settings in response to alleged browser
hijackings rather than those pages which are user selected
was just criticized by Walter Mossberg in his Wall Street
Journal article reviewing this Microsoft application.
Microsoft's response to him was not particularly
convincing. This needs to be addressed more effectively.
Also I now realize from reading other messages posted on
this newsgroup that one of the threats that I removed after
being warned to do so by this program was a feature of
SpyBot S&D. I'm also more than a little miffed about that
and the way both these false threats were described with
such assuredness as high or elevated risk threats without
the slightest element of doubt being expressed. Yes I know
it is a beta but how hard is it to at least recognize a)
the browser default page of an MS collaborator and b) a
component of a widely used competitive spyware program?
concerning my present IE 6.0 browser default home page
which is
http://dslstart.verizon.net/vzn.dsl/welcome.htm?ver=23290&
This page was set by my ISP Veizon DSL.
Since Verizon DSL and MSN are in collaboration to provide
software for Verizon DSL my ISP, I am sure this situation
is going to make Verizon feel decidedly warm and fuzzy
about Microsoft.
The issue of setting only Microsoft pages as default
browser restore settings in response to alleged browser
hijackings rather than those pages which are user selected
was just criticized by Walter Mossberg in his Wall Street
Journal article reviewing this Microsoft application.
Microsoft's response to him was not particularly
convincing. This needs to be addressed more effectively.
Also I now realize from reading other messages posted on
this newsgroup that one of the threats that I removed after
being warned to do so by this program was a feature of
SpyBot S&D. I'm also more than a little miffed about that
and the way both these false threats were described with
such assuredness as high or elevated risk threats without
the slightest element of doubt being expressed. Yes I know
it is a beta but how hard is it to at least recognize a)
the browser default page of an MS collaborator and b) a
component of a widely used competitive spyware program?