I
imalone
I bought a Pentium 4 3.2E (Prescott core) yesterday. I noticed it was
running hotter than my old 2.26 P4, and after looking around the net
I'm now aware that it would have probably been a better choice to go
with a Northwood core CPU.
Is is worth the hassle of exchanging the Prescott for a Northwood? Or
should I just keep the Prescott.
Some more information:
I'm not having bad heat issues, I don't think. My case is not TAC, or
whatever, but I'm getting CPU temps that hover around the high-40's
idle. I ran 95Prime with the "high heat" test for an hour, and topped
out at 61c.
Then to really push it, since 95Prime only uses 50% or the
Hyper-Threading stuff, I ran the following all at the same time for 15
minutes:
1. 95Prime (high heat test)
2. CPU Burn-in 1.4 (high heat test)
3. Lord of the Rings: The Battle for middle earth (minimized)
4. 3DMark 03 (ran multiple times)
I pegged the CPU at 100% for the duration of the test. I know 3DMark
won't really stress the CPU, but I figured it would heat up the video
card and maybe raise the case temp.
Under this heavy load I was averaging mid-60's on the CPU. I think the
highest temp as 66c. That's about as high as I can push it.
My "System Zone 1" is high 30's idle, mid 40's under load.
My "System Zone 2" is high 40's idle, mid 50's under load.
So my questions are:
1. Should I be worried about the heat? When do the Prescotts start to
throttle?
2. Are the performance disadvantages that the Prescott has bad enough
to warrant a return? Or will they age better than a 3.2 Northwood? By
that I mean, will the stuff that Intel added (longer pipeline, larger
L2 cache) that is making the chip perform worse than a Northwood help
it perform better than the Northwood in a year or so?
I use this PC for games and some audio/video stuff. The motherboard is
an Intel 865PERL, and I have 2x512MB PC3200RAM.
Thanks in advance.
running hotter than my old 2.26 P4, and after looking around the net
I'm now aware that it would have probably been a better choice to go
with a Northwood core CPU.
Is is worth the hassle of exchanging the Prescott for a Northwood? Or
should I just keep the Prescott.
Some more information:
I'm not having bad heat issues, I don't think. My case is not TAC, or
whatever, but I'm getting CPU temps that hover around the high-40's
idle. I ran 95Prime with the "high heat" test for an hour, and topped
out at 61c.
Then to really push it, since 95Prime only uses 50% or the
Hyper-Threading stuff, I ran the following all at the same time for 15
minutes:
1. 95Prime (high heat test)
2. CPU Burn-in 1.4 (high heat test)
3. Lord of the Rings: The Battle for middle earth (minimized)
4. 3DMark 03 (ran multiple times)
I pegged the CPU at 100% for the duration of the test. I know 3DMark
won't really stress the CPU, but I figured it would heat up the video
card and maybe raise the case temp.
Under this heavy load I was averaging mid-60's on the CPU. I think the
highest temp as 66c. That's about as high as I can push it.
My "System Zone 1" is high 30's idle, mid 40's under load.
My "System Zone 2" is high 40's idle, mid 50's under load.
So my questions are:
1. Should I be worried about the heat? When do the Prescotts start to
throttle?
2. Are the performance disadvantages that the Prescott has bad enough
to warrant a return? Or will they age better than a 3.2 Northwood? By
that I mean, will the stuff that Intel added (longer pipeline, larger
L2 cache) that is making the chip perform worse than a Northwood help
it perform better than the Northwood in a year or so?
I use this PC for games and some audio/video stuff. The motherboard is
an Intel 865PERL, and I have 2x512MB PC3200RAM.
Thanks in advance.