B
Brooke
I am helping develop a SQL Server 2005 application with a C# front-end.
Originally I was using untyped datasets and stored procedures and it worked
fine. Now I have been told to used typed datasets and table adapters. Is
it a good idea to use typed datasets on a database with about 25 tables?
Typed datasets are much easier in some aspects, but I am finding it
difficult to change certain things without the application blowing up, and
it takes a lot of effort to maintain the typed datasets if the underlying
SQL Server database structure changes (new fields, renamed fields, new
constraints, etc.).
Any suggestions or opinions would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Originally I was using untyped datasets and stored procedures and it worked
fine. Now I have been told to used typed datasets and table adapters. Is
it a good idea to use typed datasets on a database with about 25 tables?
Typed datasets are much easier in some aspects, but I am finding it
difficult to change certain things without the application blowing up, and
it takes a lot of effort to maintain the typed datasets if the underlying
SQL Server database structure changes (new fields, renamed fields, new
constraints, etc.).
Any suggestions or opinions would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks