M
Marcel Overweel
JBOD isn't RAID but it is mentioned a lot with RAID controllers.
I found the following text on the net:
"A lot of people talk about JBOD and disk spanning as being
considered forms of RAID. This is not really true; JBOD stands
for Just a Bunch Of Disks and its purpose is to combine
multiple hard disks into one. It does not provide redundancy,
and therefore is not technically a level of RAID. However, JBOD
is useful if you have an application that requires mass amounts
of contiguous hard disk space and you don't have a large drive
to use. This should only be used as a band-aid fix though, as
several drives combined leads to increased chances of failure."
So what is the risk if one drive failes?
Do I lose the whole array?
The reason I ask: I am not concerned about data safety.
I have a server just as a data store for a media streamer.
Everything stored on that server is also backed-up on cd's
and dvd's.
But if it means that, if one drive fails it ruins the whole array,
I'd rather not use jbod at all.
(I'm talking about 6TB of data and I don't want to copy
*everything* if 1TB drive failes.)
regards,
Marcel
I found the following text on the net:
"A lot of people talk about JBOD and disk spanning as being
considered forms of RAID. This is not really true; JBOD stands
for Just a Bunch Of Disks and its purpose is to combine
multiple hard disks into one. It does not provide redundancy,
and therefore is not technically a level of RAID. However, JBOD
is useful if you have an application that requires mass amounts
of contiguous hard disk space and you don't have a large drive
to use. This should only be used as a band-aid fix though, as
several drives combined leads to increased chances of failure."
So what is the risk if one drive failes?
Do I lose the whole array?
The reason I ask: I am not concerned about data safety.
I have a server just as a data store for a media streamer.
Everything stored on that server is also backed-up on cd's
and dvd's.
But if it means that, if one drive fails it ruins the whole array,
I'd rather not use jbod at all.
(I'm talking about 6TB of data and I don't want to copy
*everything* if 1TB drive failes.)
regards,
Marcel