What are these files?

  • Thread starter Thread starter richard
  • Start date Start date
R

richard

The following file showed up in C:/
fe571954febc88fa60f7f8f000e90a
with two subfolders: AMD64 and i386.

Any idea what these are? Can they be safely deleted?
 
richard said:
The following file showed up in C:/
fe571954febc88fa60f7f8f000e90a
with two subfolders: AMD64 and i386.

Any idea what these are? Can they be safely deleted?


Are they causing you a problem? Are you running out of hard drive space?
 
richard said:
The following file showed up in C:/
fe571954febc88fa60f7f8f000e90a
with two subfolders: AMD64 and i386.

Any idea what these are? Can they be safely deleted?

Update temporary working folders.
 
Mike said:
Are they causing you a problem? Are you running out of hard drive
space?

Since you can only answer a question with a question, I assume then that
you don't know the answer so you're wasting time instead.

I'd expect an MVP to know the answer to those questions and to quickly
advise the OP not to delete them. They are important system file storage
locations which may get used at the odd time something goes wrong in the
operating sysem. In fact there may be more than one i386 folder, don't
know about the other one; sounds like a vendor specific thing.
 
Twayne said:
Since you can only answer a question with a question, I assume then that
you don't know the answer so you're wasting time instead.

I'd expect an MVP to know the answer to those questions and to quickly
advise the OP not to delete them. They are important system file storage
locations which may get used at the odd time something goes wrong in the
operating sysem. In fact there may be more than one i386 folder, don't
know about the other one; sounds like a vendor specific thing.


Nope.. wanted to know why the OP is cruising through folders looking for
something to delete. Most do it to try to save space..
 
Mike said:
Nope.. wanted to know why the OP is cruising through folders looking
for something to delete. Most do it to try to save space..

But it's silly to waste time with nothing but another question. It's
fine to leave a caveat or standard practice note, but to do nothing but
ask another question IMO is a waste of your, and the OPs, and any one
wishing to learn from the answers, time. He may well be wondering about
space, or perhaps as I used to do, cruising and trying to learn. I
always appreciated on topic responses, even if they included "but ... "
or warnings or whatever. Nothing but a question though and, well, that
was sort of a reason to take a pass on that person's advice. It's often
like you ask the question simply so you can call the OP, shall we say,
less intelligent than yourself.

I leave well-intended questions WITH the response, not to stand on
their own and further delay a possibly useful response. And if I'm just
curious, I say so too.

Regards,

Twayne
 
Twayne said:
But it's silly to waste time with nothing but another question. It's
fine to leave a caveat or standard practice note, but to do nothing
but ask another question IMO is a waste of your, and the OPs, and
any one wishing to learn from the answers, time. He may well be
wondering about space, or perhaps as I used to do, cruising and
trying to learn. I always appreciated on topic responses, even if
they included "but ... " or warnings or whatever. Nothing but a
question though and, well, that was sort of a reason to take a pass
on that person's advice. It's often like you ask the question
simply so you can call the OP, shall we say, less intelligent than
yourself.
I leave well-intended questions WITH the response, not to stand on
their own and further delay a possibly useful response. And if I'm
just curious, I say so too.

And that is what is known as "Your opinion" and those vary from person to
person. ;-)
 
The following file showed up in C:/
But it's silly to waste time with nothing but another question. It's
fine to leave a caveat or standard practice note, but to do nothing but
ask another question IMO is a waste of your, and the OPs, and any one
wishing to learn from the answers, time. He may well be wondering about
space, or perhaps as I used to do, cruising and trying to learn. I
always appreciated on topic responses, even if they included "but ... "
or warnings or whatever. Nothing but a question though and, well, that
was sort of a reason to take a pass on that person's advice. It's often
like you ask the question simply so you can call the OP, shall we say,
less intelligent than yourself.

I leave well-intended questions WITH the response, not to stand on
their own and further delay a possibly useful response. And if I'm just
curious, I say so too.

Regards,

Twayne

Right on!!!

I could not tell you how many times I asked a question just because I
was trying to learn this system when I got it but would be told to
leave this or that alone and not to worry about it.

My opinion was that they could answer the question then tell you why
you should leave it alone or whatever.

Growing up I was always told the only dumd question was the one not
asked also that is the way you learn is by asking question but
sometimes it is really hard to get a straight answer to any question
asked here or in any of the groups.
 
Twayne said:
But it's silly to waste time with nothing but another question. It's fine
to leave a caveat or standard practice note, but to do nothing but ask
another question IMO is a waste of your, and the OPs, and any one wishing
to learn from the answers, time. He may well be wondering about space, or
perhaps as I used to do, cruising and trying to learn. I always
appreciated on topic responses, even if they included "but ... " or
warnings or whatever. Nothing but a question though and, well, that was
sort of a reason to take a pass on that person's advice. It's often like
you ask the question simply so you can call the OP, shall we say, less
intelligent than yourself.

I leave well-intended questions WITH the response, not to stand on their
own and further delay a possibly useful response. And if I'm just curious,
I say so too.

Regards,

Twayne


There is no standard answer..
 
Back
Top