B
blaz
I'm trying to get the colors right from 35mm negatives (yes, I know,
I've been warned...). Nikon LS-2000; VueScan 8.3.04; Wolf Faust IT8
reflective target. For completeness, in the present case, I'm trying to
profile a roll of Konica Centuria-100. Unsure what to do about the
preliminary steps of determining RGB exposure and Film Base Color
(Vuescan help, Advanced workflow). So I tried both (each time
restarting from a "blank state" having deleted vuescan.ini):
A) Skip steps of RGB exposure and film base color. Follow the steps to
create a profile from a scan of a negative shot of the Wolf Faust
target.
B) Go through determination of RGB exposure and film base color before
creating the profile.
The two profiles are quite different, e.g. the gammas. Case A:
2.98/2.78/2.66; case B: 5.75/5.14/4.93. This is not consistent with a
post by Bart van der Wolf 30-Aug-2004: "VueScan bases its calibration
on the Raw data..." . Or I don't understand what is a raw scan.
Besides, trying to use either profile in a (what I believe to be a)
consistent way, i.e. skip/include the determination of RGB exp and base
color for the scanning itself consistently with what was done for the
profile, I do not get plausible colors (either way), and end up
fiddling with autocolors in PS. Which I wanted to avoid.
Can anyone provide advice and/or a definite, step-by-step procedure
and/or explanations? Thanks by advance!
Regards,
Bernard
I've been warned...). Nikon LS-2000; VueScan 8.3.04; Wolf Faust IT8
reflective target. For completeness, in the present case, I'm trying to
profile a roll of Konica Centuria-100. Unsure what to do about the
preliminary steps of determining RGB exposure and Film Base Color
(Vuescan help, Advanced workflow). So I tried both (each time
restarting from a "blank state" having deleted vuescan.ini):
A) Skip steps of RGB exposure and film base color. Follow the steps to
create a profile from a scan of a negative shot of the Wolf Faust
target.
B) Go through determination of RGB exposure and film base color before
creating the profile.
The two profiles are quite different, e.g. the gammas. Case A:
2.98/2.78/2.66; case B: 5.75/5.14/4.93. This is not consistent with a
post by Bart van der Wolf 30-Aug-2004: "VueScan bases its calibration
on the Raw data..." . Or I don't understand what is a raw scan.
Besides, trying to use either profile in a (what I believe to be a)
consistent way, i.e. skip/include the determination of RGB exp and base
color for the scanning itself consistently with what was done for the
profile, I do not get plausible colors (either way), and end up
fiddling with autocolors in PS. Which I wanted to avoid.
Can anyone provide advice and/or a definite, step-by-step procedure
and/or explanations? Thanks by advance!
Regards,
Bernard