Vuescan preview resolution 200 DPI

  • Thread starter Thread starter SofaKing
  • Start date Start date
S

SofaKing

I'm using an Epson 3200.

When I custom set my preview resolution at 200, very low quality image. At
201 however, a DRAMATIC difference. Why? Scanning MF negs.
 
I can't understand your grammatic or Netbonics.

Why are you touching the preview setting? I think it is already set
at low quality by default.

I have the 3200 for MF B/W film. I find no objection to using the
preview settings as they are. My final scan is at 3200dpi, 16bit
Gray, to a TIFF file. My file sizes are about 300MB.
 
SofaKing said:
When I custom set my preview resolution at 200, very low quality image. At
201 however, a DRAMATIC difference. Why?

I don't know the Epson 3200 but this explanation (with different
numbers) should apply to any scanner.

When you scan at the native resolution of the scanner divided by an
integer the image is created by dropping samples (pixels if you prefer
to think of it that way). So if the native resolution is 3200 and you
scan at 200, that is full resolution divided by 16. The software
(VueScan) instructs the scanner to take only every 16th sample in
horizontal and vertical direction so you keep only 1 sample (pixel) in
256. (256 = 16 squared). That accentuates the noise (both random and
grain aliasing)in the image by a similar factor. The result is a very
poor quality image.

When you scan at a resolution which is not an integral division of the
native resolution (e.g. 201 does not divide into 3200 a whole number
of times), the image cannot be created by dropping samples. So VueScan
scans the film at full resolution (3200) and then downsamples the
result by software interpolation. i.e. it looks at all the samples
(pixels) in the high resolution (3200) image and creates the low
resolution (201) image by forming each final pixel from an average of
many pixels. At 201, each pixel is (roughly) the average of 256
original samples. (The exact averaging mechanism depends on the
software interpolation method that the software uses, so that
bilinear, bicubic and others will produce slightly different results,
but the principle is the same. I believe VueScan uses something like
bilinear interpolation). This averaging process results in a huge
reduction of image noise and produces a high quality result.

You should also notice that scanning at a whole number division of
full resolution (200) is much faster than at non integral divisions
(201) because so many fewer samples are taken and the motor can
advance the scanning device many steps before stopping to take a
sample. These integral divisions of full resolution are the ones that
appear in VueScan's drop down menu of scanning resolutions.

(PS I post using Google so it is possible that someone else will post
a similar explanation before this reaches the News Group!)
 
That's a new one on me. Netbonics. Should it be NetPhonics....Something new
everyday I guess. Even at my age. OK. Sorry I abb'rev'ate evrything.
Anyhoo....I'll clarify...hopefully....

It's all about workflow (read: "speed") with VueScan. I'm trying to optimize
my previews on VueScan. I'm scanning 2.25" X 2.25" negatives, medium format
(MF). I don't want to have to sit and wait too long to view the preview. I
just want something reasonable so I can crop and then hit scan. So I start
reducing the preview scan resolution in custom mode. I found that 201 pixels
per inch produce a nice preview. As soon as I crept it down to 200 the image
fell apart. Horribly pixelated. Yuck, in otherwords. So I'm wondering is it
me, my scanner, math or vuescan?

BTW why are you scanning at 3200 DPI? are you really printing these images
at 30"? If you're not you're just wasting time.
 
I think you're right. Or close. It's an aliasing issue. The scans at 200 and
201 are both quick but one sounds different than the other. They're not 3200
DPI though. That would take more like three minutes per scan. I suspect the
one done at 201 has more in common with the scan done at 400. I'm guessing
the previews go up in "steps".
 
Back
Top