B
Brian Begy
Has anyone else observed this:
1) Take a project that contains a reference to a dll.
2) Remove said dll from the original location.
3) Build project.
Instead of failing at compile time, as any sensible compiler should, we
see Visual Studio looking around and finding another dll of the same
name to replace the missing one. In every case, this causes a
versioning conflict at runtime instead of breaking on compile.
1) Has anyone else experienced this?
2) Is there a way to turn off this insane behavior?
3) Have the people responsible been punished?
4) If not, can I help?
Brian
BugSentry needs beta testers!
www.bugsentry.com
1) Take a project that contains a reference to a dll.
2) Remove said dll from the original location.
3) Build project.
Instead of failing at compile time, as any sensible compiler should, we
see Visual Studio looking around and finding another dll of the same
name to replace the missing one. In every case, this causes a
versioning conflict at runtime instead of breaking on compile.
1) Has anyone else experienced this?
2) Is there a way to turn off this insane behavior?
3) Have the people responsible been punished?
4) If not, can I help?
Brian
BugSentry needs beta testers!
www.bugsentry.com