A
Alastair Smeaton
I have a problem with Susan claiming that this group has voted to move
the pricelessware site.
She quoted that 51 people voted to move, 14 to stay (or something like
that)
My problem is that I refused to follow threads religiously, as much of
the posting was full of childish nonsense behaviour, and reaction to
that - as a result, I did not even realise that there was an official
vote.
A quick poll shows that this whole issue seems to have generated
literally thousands of posts - so how we could conclude that there
were less than 100 votes cast, I do not know.
Can we either agree to start again, or just let those interested in
setting up a site get on with it.
The most important thing is that this GROUP (not any website) debates,
votes on and decides what is priceless.
Where this is hosted, or how it is presented, does not really matter.
the pricelessware site.
She quoted that 51 people voted to move, 14 to stay (or something like
that)
My problem is that I refused to follow threads religiously, as much of
the posting was full of childish nonsense behaviour, and reaction to
that - as a result, I did not even realise that there was an official
vote.
A quick poll shows that this whole issue seems to have generated
literally thousands of posts - so how we could conclude that there
were less than 100 votes cast, I do not know.
Can we either agree to start again, or just let those interested in
setting up a site get on with it.
The most important thing is that this GROUP (not any website) debates,
votes on and decides what is priceless.
Where this is hosted, or how it is presented, does not really matter.