E
Ed Sutherland
I'm considering switching soon to Vista Home Premium. However, I've heard
the new OS places heavy memory demands and may not work with all systems. I
have a "Windows Vista Capable" Toshiba Satellite laptop with a 1.xGB dual
core processor and 1GB of system memory, part of which is consumed for
graphics.
Testing RC2 (5744) there is a noticable delay after launching an
application.
How much memory do I need for Vista to be as quick as XP when launching
applications? With modern systems which have gigbytes of processing speed
and memory, there should not be a noticeable delay.
Secondly, this laptop uses a portion of system memory for graphics. I know
Vista is graphics intensive -- could this be another reason for the
slowdown?
I don't want to invest hundred in upgrades, new software and whatever else
is needed to get Vista up to speed, only to discover it won't work properly
on my system. Thanks for any assistance.
the new OS places heavy memory demands and may not work with all systems. I
have a "Windows Vista Capable" Toshiba Satellite laptop with a 1.xGB dual
core processor and 1GB of system memory, part of which is consumed for
graphics.
Testing RC2 (5744) there is a noticable delay after launching an
application.
How much memory do I need for Vista to be as quick as XP when launching
applications? With modern systems which have gigbytes of processing speed
and memory, there should not be a noticeable delay.
Secondly, this laptop uses a portion of system memory for graphics. I know
Vista is graphics intensive -- could this be another reason for the
slowdown?
I don't want to invest hundred in upgrades, new software and whatever else
is needed to get Vista up to speed, only to discover it won't work properly
on my system. Thanks for any assistance.