Vista comparison

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

Anyone know of a good link where all the Vista versions are broken down by
comparison in features (64 bit, 32 bit, Aero, etc)??

Thanks
 
What does? The feature set is the same between x86 and x64, the differences
are in the processing power behind the x64 engine.

--
Best of Luck,

Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP

Windows help - www.rickrogers.org
 
So sad to explain humor. I meant her statement contrasted with her
attesting 64 bit 'not plain' in her signature.

You must have some super spam blocking software- A real non munged Email
address!
 
Been non-munged for many, many years, and there's plenty of spam and lots of
filters. If I had a nickel for every bit of spam - no wait, then I'd be Bill
G. <g>

I knew it was intended to be humor, I just couldn't figure out what part of
Jane's sig you were commenting on. Somedays the brain just ain't fully
functional.

--
Best of Luck,

Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP

Windows help - www.rickrogers.org
 
Rick said:
Been non-munged for many, many years, and there's plenty of spam and
lots of filters. If I had a nickel for every bit of spam - no wait, then
I'd be Bill G. <g>

I knew it was intended to be humor, I just couldn't figure out what part
of Jane's sig you were commenting on. Somedays the brain just ain't
fully functional.
Click to expand...

I know what you mean Rick. I just wanted to say hello from 98 general
newsgroup land where you used to visit and post. I currently am using a
tri-boot system with 98SE for old legacy Windows 3.1 and DOS programs,
XP Professional for current programs and Vista for testing. I used to
post under Art when he was a house mate I would use his computer with
Outlook Express.
 
I currently am using a tri-boot system with 98SE for old legacy Windows 3.1
and DOS programs,
Click to expand...

I just have to ask ... Why?
Unless you have a really old and slow machine, I can't think of a single
reason to use Windows 3.1

-- Andy
 
Andyistic said:
I just have to ask ... Why?
Unless you have a really old and slow machine, I can't think of a single
reason to use Windows 3.1

-- Andy
Click to expand...

very old dos based programs perhaps
 
Andyistic said:
I just have to ask ... Why?
Unless you have a really old and slow machine, I can't think of a single
reason to use Windows 3.1

-- Andy
Click to expand...

It is essential to have an older operating system such as 98SE that will
support the Windows 3.1 programs and DOS programs. I and the
Albuquerque Public Schools and soon all the public schools in America
and concerned consumers will let Microsoft know they support the Classic
Windows Edition that will likely soon be in a store near you.
 
PowerUser said:
You read wrong- He's using 98, XP and Vista. Windows 3.1 is not one of
them.
Click to expand...
Correct and thanks for reading it right and it is 98 Second Edition that
has USB 2.0 support number.
 
Back
Top