Those are assumptions, not facts, similar to when Bill Gates said at WinHEC
2002 or 2003 that a Vista (then codenamed "Longhorn") capable computer then
would be 4 to 6 Ghz. So far, we are not near that without overclocking and
the approaches to Vista performance since have changed considerably
CPU score equivalent to a 4.4Ghz P4 or a 4400+ AMD K8 CPU
That is assuming the equivalent to a Intel CPU, similar to a AMD 3200+ would
be equal to a Pentium 3.2 Ghz although the actual processor speed for AMD is
not 3.2 GHz. For example, my AMD 2600 Sempron is equivalent to a 2.6 GHz
Intel Celeron. It seems to me all you do is copy and paste and don't read
what you are copying.
Suggested Intel Platforms for Windows Vista
http://www.intel.com/business/bss/ products/client/vistasolutions/index.htm
Suggested Intel Mobile Platforms for Windows Vista
http://www.intel.com/business/bss/products/client/vistasolutions/mobile.htm
AMD CPU guidelines for Windows Vista Ready PC's
http://www.amd.com/windowsvista
You're starting to seem like you were before - snappy and defensive. Cut it
out, we're all here to help.
You always do this, you can't take critquing or correction and what you
always do is say I am attacking you. But I see what you are doing and you
can go ahead and throw mud on me to make me look like ta bad guy. But I
know what I am here for, I didn't come in these newsgroups to become most
poster or looking for awards and attention. We are all here to help yes,
but we can at least add the extra effort to do some research and present
information that is easy for our fellow participants who are either
novices or intermidiates easy to understand, not just a quick link to my
blog.
--
--
Andre
Windows Connected |
http://www.windowsconnected.com
Extended64 |
http://www.extended64.com
Blog |
http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta