Would you one moment consider that Windows xp is over 5 years old and Vista
uses now Graphics outside the Kernel like Linux - you cannot backport this
new Way of handling the UI to the Way NT/XP treated it.
DirectX and the new graphical Subsystem goes hand in hand. This has not only
to do with Aero.
Vista will be the Number One Gaming OS for Desktop PCs within the next
years.
The new games-explorer and the age-restricting system show clearly that this
is the goal.
And by god : Microsoft is a company. They have developers to pay and
millions of customers to satisfy.And if they have new ideas than we should
be thankful for it. If you prefer sticking with outdated OS - then don't
bash here.
If I go and install Windows 95 and this or that isn't supported now - well
.... isn't that my fault ?
Sure, Xp has costed lots of money. 98 has costed, 3.11 wasn't cheap - but
Boy : Times change and if you must buy a new OS all 4-5 years is that too
much cost ?
People claim "Windows is too expensive!"
Vista Home Premium Full will go by around 199 US$ , OEM/Systembuilder and
the like versions for less..
How many new PC-games do you buy in one year ? each one of them goes by
40-50 US$
So the Middle-Class Vista will cost about what 4 Games will cost
- how long do you use your games ?
- how long do you use your Operating System, that will be supported for at
least five years with Updates,Extras and the like. Ten years of
security-issues-fixes, ServicePacks at least... ?
SBJ
"Perhaps Angry Customer!!!" <
[email protected]>
schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:
[email protected]...