all I know in this case- my wifes computer was taking forever to boot up,
and CPU showed minimal load - less than 10% use, but it would take >1 minute
to bring up IE, or open any other program and the mouse was in very slow
motion and it could take several minutes to bring up Word and it could take
10-15 seconds for every keystroke to register. this program found the 3
remote processes and shut them down- I suspect they were bot nets and I
was a bit surprised that MBAM did not find them-this time.
MBAM has worked well for me in the past, as it had found some issues on my
own machine a few months earlier- when I had a computer at work get infected
from google (frequent ad popups) including the 59 virus popup window- a
definite pop up ad/spyware tactic. The night before, a google infection at
home (different google search, but no navigating to listed sites)- making it
two different infections just by visiting google. A friend in Sweden
recommended MBAM and it immediately found 3 infected dll's , and
registries- found virtumonde, superjuan, Vundo and about 5 problems in all.
At the time, he told me MBAM was the only thing that was able to clean his
machine- and he had pretty much used the same stuff I was trying to use.
Since then i have found problems with MSNBC.com and pulse360 ads (more
nuisance and offensive rather than malware). I have used the MS hosts list
to block this and all the usual suspects.
Now my only problem is IE won't browse backwards a lot (IE 8 problem?)
My only point was to ask why someone called advanced system care snake oil,
since I found it on cnet with high ratings- and did not think I had to worry
about it, and just assume that of all the packages I use, in conjunction
with each other- they all take turns being either ahead or behind on the
latest threats out there. I'm certainly not a spammer pushing one program
(advanced system care) I use all that I mentioned and am concerned if there
is valid merit for dissing this package vs a person who just figured I was
spamming.
I did see the other day that MBAM is accusing these guys of ripping off
their code, so that has me concerned that if they are, support for this
package may soon evaporate- if it was "smoke and mirrors" or plagiarism (vs
snake oil) or a bit of both<G>. and I found out the company was based in
China- so that has my suspicions up too... so lets define 'snake oil' as I
am already leery of running this one ever again.
And just for those concerned- I'll use anything that gets the job done, as
soon as the next one comes out, and it clears the peer scrutiny (not a wolf
in disguise), I'm not afraid to use new stuff. but I do appreciate
everyone's feedback in calling out onto the carpet the less genuine
products.
All I'm asking for is details instead of categorizations without supporting
rationale when we start condemning products.
Thanks