VIA C3 on Slot 1 board

  • Thread starter Thread starter Morten Lundstrøm
  • Start date Start date
M

Morten Lundstrøm

Hi

Is it safe to assume that if the motherboard can run a Tualatin with
Tualatin mod then it will run a C3 on a regular slocket?

I'm basing it on the fact that tualatin requires low voltages to operate,
around the same range as the C3.

Anyone that can confirm this?

/Morten
 
Hi

Is it safe to assume that if the motherboard can run a Tualatin with
Tualatin mod then it will run a C3 on a regular slocket?

I'm basing it on the fact that tualatin requires low voltages to operate,
around the same range as the C3.

Anyone that can confirm this?

/Morten

I thought there were other issues, signal changes and BIOS support
needed though I could be wrong and it would depend on the particular
motherboard. I don't understand why you would want to run a C3 on a
board that can support a Tualatin though, even an underclocked
Tualatin (therefore low-heat) will outperform a C3.


Dave
 
I thought there were other issues, signal changes and BIOS support
needed though I could be wrong and it would depend on the particular
motherboard. I don't understand why you would want to run a C3 on a
board that can support a Tualatin though, even an underclocked
Tualatin (therefore low-heat) will outperform a C3.

The issue is power consumption, I want it to be very economical concering
electricity.
It's going to sit in a linux server running fileserver/print server, so
processing power isn't much of an issue here.
I know I could base it on a P-200 MMX and get a economical system as well,
but when I can get a processor running 1000 MHz having the same power
consumption as a P-200 MMX I'd rather go for the 1000 MHz :-)

/Morten
 
The issue is power consumption, I want it to be very economical concering
electricity.
It's going to sit in a linux server running fileserver/print server, so
processing power isn't much of an issue here.
I know I could base it on a P-200 MMX and get a economical system as well,
but when I can get a processor running 1000 MHz having the same power
consumption as a P-200 MMX I'd rather go for the 1000 MHz :-)

/Morten

That's what I was beginning to mention... Take a Tualatin Celeron
1GHz, underclocked to 66MHz FSB, with default voltage (think it's
1.45V?) the wattage would only be 10-15W at full load. Assuming your
OS has ACPI/HALT cooling it's going to mostly be sitting idle
generating under 5W, which is about the same as a C3 except higher
performance. Well, considering the use of the system, it might be
closer to equal, the reduced memory bus speed might help the C3 a
little, but it's going to be relatively close, and the Celeron's much
larger cache won't hurt.

On the other hand, if you have the ability to reduce the Celeron's
voltage, since it'd likely run stable at lower than 1.45V at 667MHz
(given the 1GHz stock part as the example) it could be running even
cooler. There really isn't going to be much difference except that
you know the Tualatin works, and if you needed more performance
someday the Tualatin could be reclocked to stock speed again.


Dave
 
Morten Lundstrøm said:
The issue is power consumption, I want it to be very economical concering
electricity.
It's going to sit in a linux server running fileserver/print server, so
processing power isn't much of an issue here.
I know I could base it on a P-200 MMX and get a economical system as well,
but when I can get a processor running 1000 MHz having the same power
consumption as a P-200 MMX I'd rather go for the 1000 MHz :-)

/Morten

A 600 celeron will only use 12.5 watts and less when idle with comparable
performance. C3s are a scam.

Lane
 
A 600 celeron will only use 12.5 watts and less when idle with comparable
performance. C3s are a scam.

Just like AMD's are a scam...

A 1Ghz C3 does not mean 1Ghz performance and neither does a AMD 2500 mean
2.5Ghz performance.

The C3 is good for what it does. The problem is that people should stop
using clock speed to rate the capabilities of a CPU. Unfortunately, nobody
has created a better system of comparison.
 
That's what I was beginning to mention... Take a Tualatin Celeron
1GHz, underclocked to 66MHz FSB, with default voltage (think it's
1.45V?) the wattage would only be 10-15W at full load. Assuming your
OS has ACPI/HALT cooling it's going to mostly be sitting idle
generating under 5W, which is about the same as a C3 except higher
performance. Well, considering the use of the system, it might be
closer to equal, the reduced memory bus speed might help the C3 a
little, but it's going to be relatively close, and the Celeron's much
larger cache won't hurt.

On the other hand, if you have the ability to reduce the Celeron's
voltage, since it'd likely run stable at lower than 1.45V at 667MHz
(given the 1GHz stock part as the example) it could be running even
cooler. There really isn't going to be much difference except that
you know the Tualatin works, and if you needed more performance
someday the Tualatin could be reclocked to stock speed again.

Ah, I see... Well then I'll probably invest in a 1000 MHz Tualatin celly and
make it run with FSB 66, I'll have to check if my motherboard can go lower
than 1.45, I think it's capable of running 1.35, but won't the processor
just draw more amps or is this locked in some way?

/Morten
 
That's what I was beginning to mention... Take a Tualatin Celeron
1GHz, underclocked to 66MHz FSB, with default voltage (think it's
1.45V?) the wattage would only be 10-15W at full load. Assuming your
OS has ACPI/HALT cooling it's going to mostly be sitting idle
generating under 5W, .......

Tualatins IMHO do not respect much about HLT instructions ... :-(

better if he would take one of the coppermines Celly´s on 100Fsb &
downclock them to 66MHz & lower them Vcore to 1,5Vcore & since they
respect well HLT command, use that too! /than also putting a HSF on
+5V would be supersilent too ..

-- Regards, SPAJKY
& visit site - http://www.spajky.vze.com
Celly-III OC-ed,"Tualatin on BX-Slot1-MoBo!"
E-mail AntiSpam: remove ##
 
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 22:15:00 +0100, "Morten Lundstrøm"


Ah, I see... Well then I'll probably invest in a 1000 MHz Tualatin celly and
make it run with FSB 66, I'll have to check if my motherboard can go lower
than 1.45, I think it's capable of running 1.35, but won't the processor
just draw more amps or is this locked in some way?

/Morten


With a voltge reduction it'll draw fewer amps, which makes the
motherboard run cooler too.


Dave
 
Just like AMD's are a scam...

A 1Ghz C3 does not mean 1Ghz performance and neither does a AMD 2500 mean
2.5Ghz performance.

The C3 is good for what it does. The problem is that people should stop
using clock speed to rate the capabilities of a CPU. Unfortunately, nobody
has created a better system of comparison.

It's not a scam because of the naming, it's a scam because it's
marketed as low-heat when any semi-modern CPU can have similar heat
output at same performance level, but aren't so cheaply made that
they're incapable of higher performance at all, as is the case with
the C3.

There is one way a C3 is better, that it allows that low heat with
high memory bus, so it's good for integrated video (with shared
memory). Even then it's only worthwhile for the smallest and quietest
of MPEG playback systems, a C3 is underpowered for high-res MPEG4
though and any normal system can easily cope with the heat output of a
Coppermine or Tualatin and do so quietly.


Dave
Via saw a niche and filled it... CPUs that are cheap to make.
 
Tualatins IMHO do not respect much about HLT instructions ... :-(

better if he would take one of the coppermines Celly´s on 100Fsb &
downclock them to 66MHz & lower them Vcore to 1,5Vcore & since they
respect well HLT command, use that too! /than also putting a HSF on
+5V would be supersilent too ..


What circumstances cause the HLT cooling to fail? I've had it working
fine, even on Win98 provided the motherboard is new enough that the
BIOS supports ACPI power management properly... is that what you're
referring to, old BX boards that may not have ACPI implemented
properly, if at all? Guess the OP needs to investigate what his board
supports if that's the issue.


Dave
 
What circumstances cause the HLT cooling to fail? I've had it working
fine, even on Win98 provided the motherboard is new enough that the
BIOS supports ACPI power management properly... is that what you're
referring to, old BX boards that may not have ACPI implemented
properly, if at all? Guess the OP needs to investigate what his board
supports if that's the issue.

well Dave, I tried a bunch of so called "softCoolers" & still the best
is Rain2.0, but on my MoBo it cools down mine Tuallie for max. 2°C at
idle; all previous CPUs drop the temp for ~10°C idling (even my spare
P200mmx). (ACPI or not!) . I must say that I have not tried WinXP,
but I believe the result would be the same!
Also debated thru different forums also the same issue on
newer Tuallie ready boards /ex. i815epT chipsets/ with same
conclusions (even P3s on Tuallie core). I am still searching for the
solution of this problem, but could be that since MS&Intel are
@hand2hand that on WinXP that could work, but I am not sure (& there
is no chance for me to go towards OS upgrade to XP since my W98seLite
for me just rocks!)

-- Regards, SPAJKY
& visit site - http://www.spajky.vze.com
Celly-III OC-ed,"Tualatin on BX-Slot1-MoBo!"
E-mail AntiSpam: remove ##
 
well Dave, I tried a bunch of so called "softCoolers" & still the best
is Rain2.0, but on my MoBo it cools down mine Tuallie for max. 2°C at
idle; all previous CPUs drop the temp for ~10°C idling (even my spare
P200mmx). (ACPI or not!) . I must say that I have not tried WinXP,
but I believe the result would be the same!
Also debated thru different forums also the same issue on
newer Tuallie ready boards /ex. i815epT chipsets/ with same
conclusions (even P3s on Tuallie core). I am still searching for the
solution of this problem, but could be that since MS&Intel are
@hand2hand that on WinXP that could work, but I am not sure (& there
is no chance for me to go towards OS upgrade to XP since my W98seLite
for me just rocks!)

Since my last post I have checked a couple systems with Tualatins in
them... one is a Gigabyte 6VX7B-4X, a Via 694X board. It's a socket
370 with a generic pin-only adapter (no voltage regulation) to use a
Tualatin, and that system does not allow the Tualatin to HLT properly.

Another system, MSI (forget the model number) Via PLE133T mATX board,
natively supports Tualatins and does properly HLT the CPU. Perhaps
it's a board design or BIOS issue, I don't know. Neither of them are
running WinXP, both Win98... plenty of Win98 licenses here, I use
98lite on some too.

Neither of the above examples used any kind of idling software, just
the OS support, making sure in Win98 that ACPI is enabled in the bios
if applicable and that Device Manager lists the ACPI BIOS... seems
like I vaguely recall there was a switch to use when installing Win98
to force ACPI mode but then with later motherboards it would install
with ACPI enabled without any additional action, no install switches
or other changes needed.


Dave
 
Another system, MSI (forget the model number) Via PLE133T mATX board,
natively supports Tualatins and does properly HLT the CPU. Perhaps
it's a board design or BIOS issue, I don't know. Neither of them are
running WinXP, both Win98... plenty of Win98 licenses here, I use
98lite on some too.

Neither of the above examples used any kind of idling software, just
the OS support, making sure in Win98 that ACPI is enabled in the bios
if applicable and that Device Manager lists the ACPI BIOS...

Today I am assembling & puting inside my case (finally!) my temp
gadget for Cpu diode measuring (I have my machine opened since I was
replacing bad caps on the MoBo) & the temps are REAL ones like this:
mine Tuallie is from Cpu diode right now @48°C - calibrated
measurment! other my temps: room 19°C, Cpu socket 38°C, Cpu HS 48°C
etc.... & one day I will install by side small normal Win98 with ACPI
(enabled also in Bios) just to check again & will monitor again true
on die temperature! & will see if it works just in case also for me.
It is for me difficult to understand, why all other CPUs do
HLT with Rain (even NB lowers temp a lot also), but when Tuallie is
inserted, than is not so. I first thought time ago, that thats because
of the mod.... Boh ...

that MSI Via PLE133T mATX board could be that (since it was the last
Via Tuallie ready chipset for small factor cases with problematic air
flow) Via implemented in Bios & MoBo (chipset revision design) some
innovative approach, so that HLT works, who knows, they have done a
lot of stuff to be the first on the market with some solutions ...
.... I am not sure how that board measures temps, check & compare them
with mine real ones & correct values a bit depending on CPU frequency.

whats are the temps & the difference between idle & full load CPU temp
on this your board, I just wonder ...

-- Regards, SPAJKY
& visit site - http://www.spajky.vze.com
Celly-III OC-ed,"Tualatin on BX-Slot1-MoBo!"
E-mail AntiSpam: remove ##
 
Today I am assembling & puting inside my case (finally!) my temp
gadget for Cpu diode measuring (I have my machine opened since I was
replacing bad caps on the MoBo) & the temps are REAL ones like this:
mine Tuallie is from Cpu diode right now @48°C - calibrated
measurment! other my temps: room 19°C, Cpu socket 38°C, Cpu HS 48°C
etc.... & one day I will install by side small normal Win98 with ACPI
(enabled also in Bios) just to check again & will monitor again true
on die temperature! & will see if it works just in case also for me.
It is for me difficult to understand, why all other CPUs do
HLT with Rain (even NB lowers temp a lot also), but when Tuallie is
inserted, than is not so. I first thought time ago, that thats because
of the mod.... Boh ...

48C does sound pretty hot for a Tually, the one I had running on the
Via 694X board wasn't overclocked, not overvolted either so it's
running pretty cool. The other one on the PLE133T board was running
at 1.5Ghz @ 1.65V, but (I'm guessing) it never got to 48C except under
full load... I don't recall the exact temps and I had an odd, very low
profile heatsink with an extremely low RPM fan on it.

that MSI Via PLE133T mATX board could be that (since it was the last
Via Tuallie ready chipset for small factor cases with problematic air
flow) Via implemented in Bios & MoBo (chipset revision design) some
innovative approach, so that HLT works, who knows, they have done a
lot of stuff to be the first on the market with some solutions ...
... I am not sure how that board measures temps, check & compare them
with mine real ones & correct values a bit depending on CPU frequency.

The PLE133T board has a very quirks like needing to isolate the BSEL1
pin to get the (AGP divider?) correct, it wouldn't work with the
Tually set to 133MHz in the BIOS, no POST at all. Now it's rock solid
at 1.5GHz but apparently the board wasn't meant for high an amperage
draw as a couple of the regulator caps got very hot... I ended up
removing them and replacing one with a larger cap and the other with a
stack of horizontally mounted caps... looks odd but fits well in the
tiny space provided.

whats are the temps & the difference between idle & full load CPU temp
on this your board, I just wonder ...

I can get the temps for the 694X board soon, but the PLE133T board was
removed from the system.... I had forgotten I even had it, then
remembered after your last post, decided to finish a project with it..
so now it's disassembled but the project got interrupted, lots of
stuff going on here right now. I may have the temp data for you in a
few days, maybe a week or two.


Dave
 
48C does sound pretty hot for a Tually, ...
it never got to 48C except under
full load...

I did the job & recalibrated the gadget again & now I get also same
max. onDie temp BUT

I also made an additional mod described here: (isolated additional 2
pins)
http://forum.oc-forums.com/vb/showt...e32c9&threadid=67417&perpage=30&pagenumber=42
(att may wrap!)
but forgot to try on my slotket w/o a ak4-An11 bridge if works; temps
are really a bit lower like Cemal Gurel describes!
Not much, but helps a bit; I wanna to do also lowering Vtt, but not
this time & also did some additional enhancements to AirFlow, since I
now run my all fans @ 5V ! (inaudible machine!)
The PLE133T board has a very quirks like needing to isolate the BSEL1
pin to get the (AGP divider?) correct, it wouldn't work with the
Tually set to 133MHz in the BIOS, no POST at all. Now it's rock solid
at 1.5GHz

good to know this particular quirk, can probably useful to some else
too!
I may have the temp data for you in a
few days, maybe a week or two.

OK



-- Regards, MERRY CHRISTMAS & HAPPY NEW YEAR, SPAJKY
& visit my site @ http://www.spajky.vze.com
Celly-III OC-ed,"Tualatin on BX-Slot1-MoBo!"
E-mail AntiSpam: remove ##
 

The 694X chipset board has idle 35, full load 39. It's a Celery
1.2GHz, running at stock speed & voltage, with an Intel P3-1GHz
heatsink that had part sawed off (previously it'd been used on a short
slotket) and the Intel/Sanyo stock fan undervolted to 7V.

The PLE133T board is running a Celeron 1.1GHz o'c to 1.47GHz @ 1.65V
by pin-mod, but BIOS registers it as 1.7V. It idles at 31C, full load
of 45C. It has a very low-profile, junk unbranded heatsink with no
redeeming qualities except low height, with a Panaflo 6cm M1A fan @
5V. Given the odd heatsink & fan I have a harder time interpreting
the temps, but with such a broad change it seems clear to me that it's
halting when idle.

I don't necessarily recommend that PLE133T motherboard though, one of
the voltage regulation caps was running VERY hot, it's onboard power
supply appears to be constrained by (cost?) and board real-estate,
wasn't fit for the resulting ripple from the high amperage the o'c
Tualatin uses... too few, small, capacitors... so I had to rig
something, took two 3cm pieces of copper wire and soldered them down
through the board where a capacitor was, and to those copper wires I
stacked a few caps horizontally, that is, lying parallel to the board.

On the other hand, that PLE133T board would probably be fine for a
stock speed Coppermine, probably it's primary target appliction as the
board had only minimal change from prior version except the PLE133
chipset was replaced with the PLE133T. I wouldn't even be running the
o'c Tualatin in that board, would've put the Tually 1.2GHz (running
stock voltage) in it, but the integrated video benefits from the
133FSB/Mem... made it capable of full-res HQ Divx playback without
any sluggishness, good margin to avoid skipped frames while running
over a wireless LAN.


Dave
 
The 694X chipset board has idle 35, full load 39. It's a Celery
1.2GHz, running at stock speed & voltage, with an Intel P3-1GHz
heatsink that had part sawed off (previously it'd been used on a short
slotket) and the Intel/Sanyo stock fan undervolted to 7V.
The PLE133T board is running a Celeron 1.1GHz o'c to 1.47GHz @ 1.65V
by pin-mod, but BIOS registers it as 1.7V. It idles at 31C, full load
of 45C. It has a very low-profile, junk unbranded heatsink with no
redeeming qualities except low height, with a Panaflo 6cm M1A fan @
5V. Given the odd heatsink & fan I have a harder time interpreting
the temps, but with such a broad change it seems clear to me that it's
halting when idle.

like I see & compare & a bit recalculate with mine, it is obvious that
both read temps not from onDie (mine has right now 47°C @ 20 amb
practically idle),but from socket sensor (are similar to mine from
socket!) & first MoBo does not Idle properly! BUT :

the second one it looks it really does it properly it should, uff, it
is the first one that I hear that does HLT properly; I really wonder
what VIA has implemented & how on that PLE one that works Ok.
Miracle?!!? ...

But i still think that Tuallie alone does not HLT properly by itself
(like AMDs also do not & need additional software like CPUcool to do
it even on NT familly based OSes) but instead VIA implemented some
trick to cool down a Tuallie (since this MoBo is IMHO intended for
small factor cases having problems of cooling) using maybe a function
in drivers or Bios to redirect that binar instruction to the MoBo
forcing it to in fact throttling down the clock generator or even
disable it for the core of Cpu in times of idleing. Could be that they
after seeing the problem managed it this way (the result would be
practically the same! for external observer. Wise thing to prevent
heating the box! :-) ... clever guys there in Taiwan ... :-)

-- Regards, MERRY HOLIDAYS & HAPPY NEW YEAR, SPAJKY ®
& visit my site @ http://www.spajky.vze.com
Celly-III OC-ed,"Tualatin on BX-Slot1-MoBo!"
E-mail AntiSpam: remove ##
 
like I see & compare & a bit recalculate with mine, it is obvious that
both read temps not from onDie (mine has right now 47°C @ 20 amb
practically idle),but from socket sensor (are similar to mine from
socket!) & first MoBo does not Idle properly! BUT :

The Gigabyte 694X board does have a socket temp sensor. Further, I'm
amazed that it reads as high as it does, because the Tualatin adapter
completely blocks the sensor and isolates it from the CPU. Given
that, I now wonder if the board does have the ability to revert to
reading the on-die diode.

The PLE133T board must be reading from the on-die diode, it has no
other sensor. IIRC, an earlier version of the board did but not the
later, perhaps last version, which I have.

I'm not sure I can agree that an on-die sensor would typically read
47C temps... even the 1.2GHz-on-694X Tualatin here, produces very
little heat. It wouldn't even be running in the 30s (celsius) if it
had a case with better ventilation or if the fan were producing more
normal airflow rate... the constraints of a poor case and desire for
low noise were exactly why I used a Tualatin at the time. It was a
similar situation with the other Tualatin @ 1.47GHz, I had it in
slightly modified IBM Netvista case with horrendous airflow and
heatsink height limitations.

the second one it looks it really does it properly it should, uff, it
is the first one that I hear that does HLT properly; I really wonder
what VIA has implemented & how on that PLE one that works Ok.
Miracle?!!? ...

I don't know about Miracle, perhaps just proper BIOS support. The
Intel Celeron Datasheet for the 1.2GHz Tualatin does make same mention
of HLT states as did the prior Coppermine Celeron 'sheets. From
what I vaguely recall, my sister's Dell Inspiron laptop has what's
essentially a Tualatin mPGA CPU, which I suspect also HLT-idles, on a
??? brand 815 chipset mainboard.

But i still think that Tuallie alone does not HLT properly by itself
(like AMDs also do not & need additional software like CPUcool to do
it even on NT familly based OSes) but instead VIA implemented some
trick to cool down a Tuallie (since this MoBo is IMHO intended for
small factor cases having problems of cooling) using maybe a function
in drivers or Bios to redirect that binar instruction to the MoBo
forcing it to in fact throttling down the clock generator or even
disable it for the core of Cpu in times of idleing. Could be that they
after seeing the problem managed it this way (the result would be
practically the same! for external observer. Wise thing to prevent
heating the box! :-) ... clever guys there in Taiwan ... :-)

Some AMDs do though. I've had a couple Gigabyte boards that did, were
Via KT333 chipset (forget model name). Since most of the Athlon
boards can HLT idle the CPU after a couple of chipset registers are
changed, it would be simple enough for the motherboard manufacturer to
just set those registers automatically or with a BIOS option, but
since it reduces performance and possibly PCI issues, most disabled
it.
 
The PLE133T board must be reading from the on-die diode, it has no
other sensor. IIRC, an earlier version of the board did but not the
later, perhaps last version, which I have.

sometimes they use just a small SMD element inside socket & you can
not tell/find easily/see which one is a resistor, a NTC probe or
capacitor & sometimes there is no marks on them or are so tiny, that
you need a powerful magnifying glass to see the difference (this is
case with my MoBo temp sensor also!)
I'm not sure I can agree that an on-die sensor would typically read
47C temps... even the 1.2GHz-on-694X Tualatin here, produces very
little heat.

for that one in mine case would be few °C less, but also my cooler @
idle does not get hot, barelly warm .. also mine does not produce much
heat @ idle ...
It wouldn't even be running in the 30s (celsius) if it
had a case with better ventilation or if the fan were producing more
normal airflow rate... the constraints of a poor case and desire for
low noise were exactly why I used a Tualatin at the time. It was a
similar situation with the other Tualatin @ 1.47GHz, I had it in
slightly modified IBM Netvista case with horrendous airflow and
heatsink height limitations.

well my old CPU sensor fixed now inside socket says now 38° & the
temperature of the bottom of a HS is 36°C & these 2 temps if fans are
running show greater differences with diminishing/rising room temps
than the one from the core /I made an experiment varying a week ago
after fixing properly my gadget inside case the temps - leaving the PC
in a cold room @ 10°C & later heating it up with a hair dryer in a
catoon box to 35°C -simulating hot summer for more than an hour/, so
the "amb" temps were -10 to +15 °C than a normal 20° my room one. I
tried with an idle & full load & generally so with TL 25°C of
difference of Amb temp, the core temp difference was less (-5max to
+10max, TL max of 15°C difference), while the other sensors followed
amb temps changes quite well ... interesting findings came out (have
to update soon my website). The same behavior shows also Coppermine
Celly600@900 but with much greater Idle/full load difference &
naturally lower temps in generally, since its HLT works properly with
Rain even if the gadget calibrated & made for Tuallie should show for
the Cu-Mine minor differences in temps; the Tuallie shows from onDie
only few °C of difference there in my setup....

There is no doubt, that my temps are false, since I am quite capable
in electronics & made so many experiments because of my curiosity & I
was also surprised by mine own findings. I checked, rechecked &
recalibrated my sensors so many times with different CPUs, that I am
really sick of experimenting with temps ... ;-)
I don't know about Miracle, perhaps just proper BIOS support.

Could be!
The
Intel Celeron Datasheet for the 1.2GHz Tualatin does make same mention
of HLT states as did the prior Coppermine Celeron 'sheets.

I know that, so I was disapointed of seeing higher temps than should
be & I first thought that this is happening because of the mod. :-(
but it looks it is not the case ...
From
what I vaguely recall, my sister's Dell Inspiron laptop has what's
essentially a Tualatin mPGA CPU, which I suspect also HLT-idles, on a
??? brand 815 chipset mainboard.

Yes, but mobile CPU have a bit different core schematics than a
desktop ones IMHO, not just the package & better power management!
Could be that Intel intentually cripled desktop Tualatins HLT to
prevent using them on cheap Laptops by some manufacturers, who knows,
Intel does not always tell the truth, we know that ... & replaced them
with a crap of p4 based Cellys ...
Some AMDs do though. I've had a couple Gigabyte boards that did, were
Via KT333 chipset (forget model name). Since most of the Athlon
boards can HLT idle the CPU after a couple of chipset registers are
changed, it would be simple enough for the motherboard manufacturer to
just set those registers automatically or with a BIOS option, but
since it reduces performance and possibly PCI issues, most disabled
it.

I know that ... but some SoftCoolers work like a charm with them &
IMHO some problems using them with WinXP were already fixed till now..

..... & I would like also to know some hardware register tweak like
those for AMDs for my Tuallie to cool it down better ... but it looks
no joy till now :-(

Another interesting experiment I made time ago with a program
Hmonitor: you can set it to full throttle the Cpu thru Bios directly
starting even with lower temps than ambient ones: oh, that cools than
properly my Tuallie really well like HLT shoud, but ... the machine
becomes sluggish like a turtle :-)))))) ... a feel of 90´ .... :-)))


-- Regards, MERRY HOLIDAYS & HAPPY NEW YEAR, SPAJKY ®
& visit my site @ http://www.spajky.vze.com
Celly-III OC-ed,"Tualatin on BX-Slot1-MoBo!"
E-mail AntiSpam: remove ##
 
Back
Top