VB Code question

  • Thread starter Thread starter rasta475
  • Start date Start date
R

rasta475

I am working with a Compact Framework project that was written in
VB.Net using Visual Studio .Net 2003. That said I have been given the
task of making it run "faster". I am a C# programmer and I know there
are statistics out there for different ways to do the same thing an
which is faster.

Ex. Casting variables in C# I know the (int)MyStringVariable; is slower
than int.Parse(MyStringVariable);

I was wondering if there were such stats for VB.Net like using the
older VB6 type methods of InStr and Mid versus using
MyStringVariable.Contains() or MyStringVariable.SubString()?

Does anyone have a reference for this and maybe how I can improve
performance on an app that was written by a VB6 developer who just
learned VB.Net and applied a lot of VB6 coding practices?

Note: I do not wish to cause a battle between C# and VB.Net or VB6
developers here. Just looking for info.
 
I am working with a Compact Framework project that was written in
VB.Net using Visual Studio .Net 2003. That said I have been given the
task of making it run "faster". I am a C# programmer and I know there
are statistics out there for different ways to do the same thing an
which is faster.

Ex. Casting variables in C# I know the (int)MyStringVariable; is slower
than int.Parse(MyStringVariable);

I was wondering if there were such stats for VB.Net like using the
older VB6 type methods of InStr and Mid versus using
MyStringVariable.Contains() or MyStringVariable.SubString()?

Does anyone have a reference for this and maybe how I can improve
performance on an app that was written by a VB6 developer who just
learned VB.Net and applied a lot of VB6 coding practices?

Note: I do not wish to cause a battle between C# and VB.Net or VB6
developers here. Just looking for info.
Click to expand...

I could have sworn that you couldn't cast a string variable to an int in
C#....I guess I'll need to try it. In any case, simple casting won't really
speed up an application much. And regardless of language used, it's really
how the app was designed in the first place. Refactoring code would be a
good start. Take a look at some of the methods, see if you could logically
speed them up by rewriting them altogether. Check loops to make sure the
amount of iterations is minimized. Check logic to make sure they are only
performing complex calculations if and when they are needed.

There are a lot of things too look for in order to speed up applications.
Primarily though, the major slow-down that I've pulled my hair out over is
other people's loops. For example, a loop that is set up to find a record.
If they find the record they are looking for, they set a variable that's
declared outside the loop...AND KEEP LOOPING! Why? I dunno, but breaking
the loop right then could save LOTS of time ... just one example :)

Anywho, hth.

Mythran
 
It seems in my post I just made that I used the term Refractor (If i
remember correctly) out of context. Basically, I mean take a look at the
overall picture of the code you are looking at and see if there's anything
sticking out that doesn't belong. Then take a look at the code piece by
piece...in manageable chunks...

:) Guess I'm just making up words as I go along (or definitions to existing
words)

Mythran
 
I am working with a Compact Framework project that was written in
VB.Net using Visual Studio .Net 2003. That said I have been given the
task of making it run "faster". I am a C# programmer and I know there
are statistics out there for different ways to do the same thing an
which is faster.

Ex. Casting variables in C# I know the (int)MyStringVariable; is
slower than int.Parse(MyStringVariable);

I was wondering if there were such stats for VB.Net like using the
older VB6 type methods of InStr and Mid versus using
MyStringVariable.Contains() or MyStringVariable.SubString()?

Does anyone have a reference for this and maybe how I can improve
performance on an app that was written by a VB6 developer who just
learned VB.Net and applied a lot of VB6 coding practices?
Click to expand...

I have some performance comparisons of CInt, Integer.Parse, Integer.TryParse,
etc at
http://devauthority.com/blogs/jwooley/archive/2006/02/15/747.aspx. In general,
it is often best to try makeing performance comparisons yourself. Also, there
is a point in which you need to balance performance and maintainability.
Sometimes saving 2 ticks isn't worth spending 2 days each time you need to
maintain the code, but in other times it is. Learning to balance these needs
is the art of programming.

Jim Wooley
http://devauthority.com/blogs/jwooley/default.aspx
 
I am working with a Compact Framework project that was written in
VB.Net using Visual Studio .Net 2003. That said I have been given the
task of making it run "faster". I am a C# programmer and I know there
are statistics out there for different ways to do the same thing an
which is faster.

Ex. Casting variables in C# I know the (int)MyStringVariable; is slower
than int.Parse(MyStringVariable);

I was wondering if there were such stats for VB.Net like using the
older VB6 type methods of InStr and Mid versus using
MyStringVariable.Contains() or MyStringVariable.SubString()?

Does anyone have a reference for this and maybe how I can improve
performance on an app that was written by a VB6 developer who just
learned VB.Net and applied a lot of VB6 coding practices?

Note: I do not wish to cause a battle between C# and VB.Net or VB6
developers here. Just looking for info.
Click to expand...
The main thing I would look at is object instantiation - it is a
resource killer. Better to have an object hang around for a while
longer than to keep making a new one. That's my 2 cents.

T
 
Rasta,

It is forever nice that people are searching for performance in looping,
casting, and all those things that takes parts of nanoseconds.

Have a look at how you are using your screen or other external devices. The
repaint of a little part of your screen takes in every system more
performance than millions times those things as I wrote above.

Have you by instance a fancy icon running, have than a look at that, maybe
it is eating up most of your processor time.

Just my first thought,

Cor
 
IMO the first step would be to try to find out where the time budget is
mostly spent. IMO it's unlikely that a cast or something similar will
produce a visible difference. If you are able to define the area where the
time is mostly spent, you'll be able to give a closer look for possible
improvments (caching, avoiding uneeded work, better algo or whatever else).
 
I am working with a Compact Framework project that was written in
VB.Net using Visual Studio .Net 2003. That said I have been given the
task of making it run "faster". I am a C# programmer and I know there
are statistics out there for different ways to do the same thing an
which is faster.

Ex. Casting variables in C# I know the (int)MyStringVariable; is slower
than int.Parse(MyStringVariable);

I was wondering if there were such stats for VB.Net like using the
older VB6 type methods of InStr and Mid versus using
MyStringVariable.Contains() or MyStringVariable.SubString()?

Does anyone have a reference for this and maybe how I can improve
performance on an app that was written by a VB6 developer who just
learned VB.Net and applied a lot of VB6 coding practices?
Click to expand...

I went through the vb6 to vb.net and faced the same issue. The
documentation contains some guidelines re performance, and in general, you
should follow them. When converting code, I did that except where it meant a
lot of work for little gain.

I also used the profiler nprof (it is freeware, others are available). It
exposes bottlenecks at the function level (not statement level), and that is
all you need for vb.net. It exposed a few things I was doing foolishly in
..net, eg:

1. Making long strings by concatenating many small pieces using the given
string operations. Use stringbuilder instead.

2. Using Mid$ assignments in loops against big strings. This a vb6 natural
that does not perform well in .net. It is similar to #1 above.

3. I was using Debug.Assert(xxx,yyy) in a loop where yyy was an expensive
function call.

I found nprof to be very productive in improving performance. I would run
my program under nprof's control, and examine the tree-like output to find
where I spent the most amount of time. In vb, that usually reduced to a
piece of the vb library, eg mid$ operations. You can look at the code that
calls the offending function and recode a small area. For me, the biggest
offender was sloppy string handling in loops.
 
Yes string handling in .net is really terrible!!

Whenever meaningful use always stringbuilder.

Also the try/catch structure, if exceptions really
occurs, is one of the worst things one can put
in a loop: a real suicide... :)

-t

AMercer ha scritto:
 
I am working with a Compact Framework project that was written in
VB.Net using Visual Studio .Net 2003. That said I have been given the
Click to expand...

I had an app written for the CF for .Net 1.1. When I recompiled the
app using .Net 2.0 CF, it ran *much* faster. One operation that
normally took about 30 - 40 seconds, now only takes about 5. So in
addition to the other replies, if you can rebuild it for CF 2.0, then
that should help as well.
 
I am working with a Compact Framework project that was written in
VB.Net using Visual Studio .Net 2003. That said I have been given the
task of making it run "faster". I am a C# programmer and I know there
are statistics out there for different ways to do the same thing an
which is faster.
Click to expand...

The best statistics are those derived from your application itself. Can
you say which line of code is taking the most processor time? If you
don't know you should find out.

Ex. Casting variables in C# I know the (int)MyStringVariable; is slower
than int.Parse(MyStringVariable);
Click to expand...

Considerably slower, since the former doesn't actually compile.
 
Back
Top