yeah; I used that a lot also
and now that they are shoving OOP down our throats-- now that we are
getting orally raped by .NET oop (whether we want it or not, we get
it)
it just doesn't seem like Microsoft has a very well rounded product
offering
I remember the good ole days when we had ONE RING TO RULE THEM ALL
oh sorry; I meant ONE LANGUAGE TO RULE THEM ALL
too bad that MS is a bunch of C++ and Excel _FAGS_ and they must have
never used Vb6.
FROM WHERE I AM STANDING; IT WAS BY FAR THE MOST SUCCESSFUL
PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE OF ALL TIME.
I mean; you could re-use code in VBS and VBA and DHTML and ASP
those were the good old days.
Too bad that MS took this whole security thing and turned it into a
SCAM.
THEY SHOULD HAVE FOCUSED ON FIXING THINGS LIKE SQL STANDARD SECURITY
INSTEAD OF FORCING FEATURES ON US THAT WE DO NOT WANT.
80% of VB6 developers 'never used a class'
I JUST WANT TO KNOW WHO THE _HELL_ THOUGHT THAT IT WAS A GOOD IDEA TO
FORCE OOP UPON US?
AND IT IS AN INCOMPLETE OOP-- OOP IN VB AND C# IS POINTLESS, IT HAS NO
MORE REAL FUNCTIONALITY THAN VB6
and of course; it's all going to change again in the next release
-Larry