I don't have much to add to Ginny's and Dick's responses. Nothing that I
said would normally been interpreted as having taken offense. I simply
indicated what the right way to do things was and two very good reasons why.
The idea that any detailed discussion should be taken off-line is exactly
the opposite of the right way to build a useful community of this sort.
You asked a question, got a short answer (it's in the SDK, which is true),
posted a reply indicating that you weren't just trolling for information
that you could have found in the manual, got two more replies, one pointing
to a sample and one indicating how to make some progress by P/Invoking, as
well as indicating that work is on-going on an open source library to help
you. That doesn't seem like the right time to go off-line, especially on a
topic that is clearly up-and-coming like SMS.
Sorry my comment about not being paid annoyed you.
Paul T.
Therese said:
Paul,
You know, I really didn't need to be told that someone posting on this
board doesn't work for Microsoft and isn't getting paid. I post on other
boards, and help people myself, yet I don't get paid. People ask to talk to
me only, and that is fine, and I don't get paid. If he doesn't want to
asnwer me, that is also his perogative and that also is fine by me, too.
I tend to ask more detailed questions of those who don't just say 'Look at
the SDK'. If that offended you, I apologize. If you want to provide more
than a basic answer, then by all means do so as well. If you don't, that is
okay too.
It has been difficult to find anyone willing to help me with this topic
without just say, look at the SDK. And until I can find someone willing, I
will keep asking. We're in a community, to help one another, not to point
and say, 'Hey, don't you dare ask for some one-on-one help because he's not
getting paid'. The thought never crossed my mind when being asked questions
and answering them.