J
JJ
Just wondering what approach you more experienced developers take here:
I am writing a basic cms system to add pages to a site. One function I want
to add is to limit access to a new page on either a role or user basis.
My basic question is:
When assigning permissions in to (for example) a page in a cms, would you
use the built in asp.net username, uid, or create your own user/role tables
and use the relevent unique ID to identify a particular user/role?
I notice cms systems like dotnetnuke etc seem to use their own user
management and not the built in asp.net user management system. I am not
sure whether this is to do with difficulties with using the 'built in' user
tables and obtaining a uid?
Also, if using the built in tables I assume you shouldn't create
relationships with them (and hence alter their structure)?
I'm a bit confused but hopefully you can see my point and what I'm trying to
say here :-\
JJ
I am writing a basic cms system to add pages to a site. One function I want
to add is to limit access to a new page on either a role or user basis.
My basic question is:
When assigning permissions in to (for example) a page in a cms, would you
use the built in asp.net username, uid, or create your own user/role tables
and use the relevent unique ID to identify a particular user/role?
I notice cms systems like dotnetnuke etc seem to use their own user
management and not the built in asp.net user management system. I am not
sure whether this is to do with difficulties with using the 'built in' user
tables and obtaining a uid?
Also, if using the built in tables I assume you shouldn't create
relationships with them (and hence alter their structure)?
I'm a bit confused but hopefully you can see my point and what I'm trying to
say here :-\
JJ