Reason #1: GUI
Reason #2: GUI
Reason #3: GUI
.
.
.
Reason #8,417: GUI
Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada
Is a GUI really better than typing something like "chkdsk C:" into the Run
box? Or, to have it pause so you can read the output, "cmd /k chkdsk c:".
Don't let the name fool you - chkdsk under WinXP is not the same thing at
all as chkdsk under Win9x, the job it does is more like what scandisk did.
You can start disk checking via a GUI type of thing by right-clicking on a
drive in Explorer and selecting Properties/Tools/Error-Checking. The
resulting GUI looks sort of like the one in Win9x - but if you ask it to
fix errors instead of just scanning for them, it will probably tell you you
need to reboot to do this (for the system drive, anyway).
The defrag utility in WinXP IS a GUI, and works better than the defrag in
Win9x, so I would see no need to use an older version of defrag.
You can get various third-party defragmenters for WinXP, but I personally
have never seen a need for this (or usually for defragmenting at all in the
first place, at least on NTFS).