Jock said:
If a USB2 card is fitted, then peripherals plugged into its
slots will benifit from USB2 speeds and capabilities.
The point was that unless you know a printer that can print a page
every couple of seconds (random figure for this example) I don't think
it will matter. A printer is limited to the speed it can print at,
which is still much slower than even USB. That's my non-expert
opinion using my observation of my not-so-slow printer using a USB1 &
then a USB2 port. No difference.
Jock said:
[ See answer above paragraph. ]
Jock said:
Downloading camera images at high speed? What's the point?
Didn't I just mention something along those lines?
However, with digital cameras, at least my cheap 2 megapixel one, I
can do pics as well as video clips, even with cheap sound. So really,
we can easily be talking video & not just still images. What are the
memory capabilities of the newer cameras? Even how much memory do the
new cameras use per image with those huge megapixels?
& since we've been talking about it all along, what is the K bps
transfer rate of USB1 vs USB2? I don't know. But if we are getting
into cameras with huge MBs of memory, maybe there is a point to it.
Not always. Some do, some don't. Most will have a facility built in
to the camera to transfer pictures from internal memory to the card.
Well I can't argue that. I mentioned my camera. I don't know about
other cameras. The built-in memory of my camera doesn't amount to
much at all compared to the memory card. Perhaps the newer cameras
with the huge megapixel capabilities have a much larger built-in
memory.
A card reader is the way to go. No need to mess around with software
to read the camera. "Photo" printers now have slots to read cards
and print copies.
I haven't stored enough images yet on my card to plop it in. But that
is good to hear.
Big Mac