USB video driver

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

I used to have a usb video driver that allowed me to see a Sanyo C40 digital
camera within xp. Now in Vista, I no longer see the device. Does anyone know
if its possible to find a 'generic' usb video driver that would work with
this camera?
 
Microsoft are not responsible for device drivers.. you should visit the
device manufacturer website.. Vista has not been officially released for
sale to the public yet, and manufacturers should be ensuring that drivers
are available for their products when it is..

Before installing a brand new OS, it is always a good idea to check for the
existence of peripheral device drivers for devices that are important to the
way you use your computer..
 
Microsoft is not responsible... not are responsible. Microsoft is a
single corporate entity, not multiple entities.
 
William, is you looking for promotion in the ranks of the 'grammar' police?
:-)
 
Mike Hall - MS MVP Windows Shell/User said:
William, is you looking for promotion in the ranks of the 'grammar'
police? :-)
Click to expand...

I see this all the time. Microsoft are. IBM are. I don't get it.

The *people* at Microsoft are. Microsoft *is*.

Mike
 
William said:
Microsoft is not responsible... not are responsible. Microsoft is a
single corporate entity, not multiple entities.
Click to expand...

It's a British English thing and Mike is British.

Alias
 
Mike said:
I see this all the time. Microsoft are. IBM are. I don't get it.

The *people* at Microsoft are. Microsoft *is*.

Mike
Click to expand...

I can see you are not bilingual in American and British English. Do you
know what a "wanker" is? All you need to do to find out is look in the
mirror.

Alias
 
Alias said:
I can see you are not bilingual in American and British English.
Click to expand...

British English has nothing to do with it. I see it in American news media
all the time.
Do you know what a "wanker" is? All you need to do to find out is look in
the mirror.
Click to expand...

Do you know what a prat is? All you need to do to find out is look in the
mirror.

Mike
 
Just like the differences in ways sports teams are referred to in the US and
Britain.
 
Mike said:
British English has nothing to do with it. I see it in American news
media all the time.


Do you know what a prat is? All you need to do to find out is look in the
mirror.

Mike
Click to expand...

Of course I know it means buttocks and, yes, with a mirror, I can see mine.

Alias
 
Unfortunately too many people don't know the difference. In the UK,
even the media sometimes states that "the government have..." instead
of "the government has...."

The government is an entity, or a body, not a group of people. So the
same applies.


Nice to see there are other people like me :-)



Jim
 
It is also an American English thing.
Microsoft IS... The people at Microsoft ARE...


| William wrote:
| > Microsoft is not responsible... not are responsible. Microsoft is a
| > single corporate entity, not multiple entities.
|
| It's a British English thing and Mike is British.
|
| Alias
| >
| > Mike Hall - MS MVP Windows Shell/User wrote:
| >> Microsoft are not responsible for device drivers.. you should visit
| >> the device manufacturer website.. Vista has not been officially
| >> released for sale to the public yet, and manufacturers should be
| >> ensuring that drivers are available for their products when it is..
| >>
| >> Before installing a brand new OS, it is always a good idea to check
| >> for the existence of peripheral device drivers for devices that are
| >> important to the way you use your computer..
| >>
| >>
| >> | >>> I used to have a usb video driver that allowed me to see a Sanyo C40
| >>> digital
| >>> camera within xp. Now in Vista, I no longer see the device. Does
| >>> anyone know
| >>> if its possible to find a 'generic' usb video driver that would work
| >>> with
| >>> this camera?
| >>>
| >>>
| >>>
| >>>
| >>>
| >>>
| >>>
| >>>
| >>>
| >>>
| >>>
| >>>
| >>>
| >>>
| >>>
| >>>
| >>>
| >>>
| >>>
| >>
 
DCR said:
It is also an American English thing.
Microsoft IS... The people at Microsoft ARE...
Click to expand...

When the British talk about a corporate entity,
the phrase [The employees of] is tacitly understood.

[The employees of] Microsoft are not responsible....

Tom Lake
 
| When the British talk about a corporate entity,
| the phrase [The employees of] is tacitly understood.
|
| [The employees of] Microsoft are not responsible....
|
| Tom Lake

Here in the US, thanks to the sick Republicans, a corporation
is considered a PERSON with all the rights and privileges
thereof.

Have sympathy for us. American citizens are under a heavy
handed, diabolical attack, especially since the demented, evil
reign of Ronald Reagan.

DCR
 
DCR said:
It is also an American English thing.
Microsoft IS... The people at Microsoft ARE...
Click to expand...

When the British talk about a corporate entity,
the phrase [The employees of] is tacitly understood.

[The employees of] Microsoft are not responsible....

Tom Lake
Click to expand...

Wriggle, wriggle :-)

The correct English would be 'Microsoft is..' - as in American. Some
English speakers are just sloppy!
 
Don't seem to have one in the old Tucker Bag.

I can see you are not bilingual in American and British English. Do you
know what a "wanker" is? All you need to do to find out is look in the
mirror.

Alias
Click to expand...
 
It is evident that you don't know history. That idea goes back into
English history to the Middle Ages.
 
There were corporations in the Middle Ages????
Get a grip!


| It is evident that you don't know history. That idea goes back into
| English history to the Middle Ages.
|
| DCR wrote:
| > | When the British talk about a corporate entity,
| > | the phrase [The employees of] is tacitly understood.
| > |
| > | [The employees of] Microsoft are not responsible....
| > |
| > | Tom Lake
| >
| > Here in the US, thanks to the sick Republicans, a corporation
| > is considered a PERSON with all the rights and privileges
| > thereof.
| >
| > Have sympathy for us. American citizens are under a heavy
| > handed, diabolical attack, especially since the demented, evil
| > reign of Ronald Reagan.
| >
| > DCR
| >
| >
 
DCR said:
There were corporations in the Middle Ages????
Get a grip!
Click to expand...

Um, more than one person at one business enterprise is what?

Even blacksmiths had assistants and I am sure the bars had more than one
employee. So, for example: Liverpool Blacksmith are a company and have
shod many a horse with a smile. The reason you don't think it's correct
is because it sounds strange to you just as referring to your apartment
as a flat or instead of driving your truck, you're driving a lorry would.

Alias
| It is evident that you don't know history. That idea goes back into
| English history to the Middle Ages.
|
| DCR wrote:
| > | When the British talk about a corporate entity,
| > | the phrase [The employees of] is tacitly understood.
| > |
| > | [The employees of] Microsoft are not responsible....
| > |
| > | Tom Lake
| >
| > Here in the US, thanks to the sick Republicans, a corporation
| > is considered a PERSON with all the rights and privileges
| > thereof.
| >
| > Have sympathy for us. American citizens are under a heavy
| > handed, diabolical attack, especially since the demented, evil
| > reign of Ronald Reagan.
| >
| > DCR
| >
| >
Click to expand...
 
Back
Top