Previously Squeeze said:
Arno Wagner wrote in news:
[email protected]
So do IDE or SATA or SCSI or... or ... or ... devices, take your pick.
True for IDE and SATA, and consequentially the corresponding
type of converter does not exist for the either. SCSI happens
to be a multi-master bus, where every device can be master, if
so inclined. In modern words, SCSI is Peer-to-Peer, while USB
needs one fixed, dedicated master, has a hierachical structure
and nothing happens without the single, fixed master.
Similarly that IDE to SCSI converters need to be a computer that
emulates a SCSI drive on the other side, babblebot?
Ahh, roddles the clueless. They are done in this way. But as SCSI
supports very slow signalling, usually a slow 8 bit SoC is enough.
Pity that IDE to SCSI converters are available in chip form anyway.
Pity that SATA to IDE converters are available in chip form anyway too.
SATA to IDE is simple, because of the same command-set,
bust structure and bus arbitration.
Hey, there's even IDE to SATA converters, imagine that eh, they plonk
a whole computer on those SATA drives.
So?
As usual: No clue, no arguments that withstand even quick
scrutiny and a big mouth.
Arno