G
Guest
I have a 32-bit edition of Windows XP running on an AMD 64 X2 cpu.
I would like to upgrade to Vista which takes advantage of the multicore
capabilities of my AMD X2 cpu. I would like to continue to have XP on a
partition on my machine. I don not want to do an in-place install over my XP
partition.
My plan was to buy an upgrade edition of vista to save some money but do a
clean install on another partition (on a new disk drive) but from what I've
read here it sounds like the upgrade edition will not allow me to install a
64bit version of Vista (even a clean install) if I'm only running 32-bit
Windows XP because the upgrade setup program must be launched from within XP,
and the 64bit setup launch program will not run if you try to launch it from
within a 32bit version of XP.
There's a lot of noise on this message board because some people are using
the word "upgrade" when to mean "replacing an installed XP partition with
vista" while others are using the word "upgrade" to mean "installing (cleanly
or in place over XP) via the ( cheaper ) upgrade DVD" I'll try to make this
clear so it's really hard to get a noisy answer:
Which of the following are true statements:
1) You cannot do a clean install of windows vista using an upgrade DVD
2) Even if you want to do a clean install of windows vista using an upgrade
DVD you have to run a vista setup program from within XP.
3) There are different vista setup programs for 64-bit and 32-bit versions
of vista
4) There is no way to run the 64-bit vista setup program from within a
32-bit version of XP
5) You cannot keep a version of XP on your disk if you use an upgrade DVD
because the upgrade DVD transfers your licence key to vista, rendering your
XP licence invalid.
6) If you want to install vista and retain your XP partition you need to buy
the full version of vista.
7) To take advantage of multicore cpus you need the 64bit edition of windows
vista
Can someone(either from Microsoft or someone who has done a clean install of
64-bit windows vista using an Upgrade DVD) tell me which of these statements
are true?
I would like to upgrade to Vista which takes advantage of the multicore
capabilities of my AMD X2 cpu. I would like to continue to have XP on a
partition on my machine. I don not want to do an in-place install over my XP
partition.
My plan was to buy an upgrade edition of vista to save some money but do a
clean install on another partition (on a new disk drive) but from what I've
read here it sounds like the upgrade edition will not allow me to install a
64bit version of Vista (even a clean install) if I'm only running 32-bit
Windows XP because the upgrade setup program must be launched from within XP,
and the 64bit setup launch program will not run if you try to launch it from
within a 32bit version of XP.
There's a lot of noise on this message board because some people are using
the word "upgrade" when to mean "replacing an installed XP partition with
vista" while others are using the word "upgrade" to mean "installing (cleanly
or in place over XP) via the ( cheaper ) upgrade DVD" I'll try to make this
clear so it's really hard to get a noisy answer:
Which of the following are true statements:
1) You cannot do a clean install of windows vista using an upgrade DVD
2) Even if you want to do a clean install of windows vista using an upgrade
DVD you have to run a vista setup program from within XP.
3) There are different vista setup programs for 64-bit and 32-bit versions
of vista
4) There is no way to run the 64-bit vista setup program from within a
32-bit version of XP
5) You cannot keep a version of XP on your disk if you use an upgrade DVD
because the upgrade DVD transfers your licence key to vista, rendering your
XP licence invalid.
6) If you want to install vista and retain your XP partition you need to buy
the full version of vista.
7) To take advantage of multicore cpus you need the 64bit edition of windows
vista
Can someone(either from Microsoft or someone who has done a clean install of
64-bit windows vista using an Upgrade DVD) tell me which of these statements
are true?