V
Vadim Rapp
Hello,
In WIN2K SP4, one domain, I have 2 GPO's; GPO 1 publishes an installation of
application X version 1 ; GPO 2 assigns an installation of the same
application X version 2; the package of version 2 specifies that version 2
upgrades version 1 from GPO 1, is a mandatory upgrade for it, and should be
installed during logon. Both publications are in the User part of the GPO;
both GPO's are authorized for UserA.
I expect that UserA will get version 2 installed during logon.
Instead, he gets installed version 1. If I run GP results from GPO
Management Console, I see version 1 in Installed Applications, with Winning
GPO = GPO 1.
If GPO 2 publishes version 2 instead of assigning it, UserA in his
add/remove programs->add new programs sees version 1. GP Results indicate
that GPO 2 was applied to UserA, however, in the published applications it
shows version 1, and winning GPO = GPO 1. Enforcing gpo 2 does not help.
Could someone explain why the fact that version 2 is mandatory upgrade for
version 1 is ignored? and, further, why assigning version 2 makes assigned
version 1?
thanks,
Vadim Rapp
In WIN2K SP4, one domain, I have 2 GPO's; GPO 1 publishes an installation of
application X version 1 ; GPO 2 assigns an installation of the same
application X version 2; the package of version 2 specifies that version 2
upgrades version 1 from GPO 1, is a mandatory upgrade for it, and should be
installed during logon. Both publications are in the User part of the GPO;
both GPO's are authorized for UserA.
I expect that UserA will get version 2 installed during logon.
Instead, he gets installed version 1. If I run GP results from GPO
Management Console, I see version 1 in Installed Applications, with Winning
GPO = GPO 1.
If GPO 2 publishes version 2 instead of assigning it, UserA in his
add/remove programs->add new programs sees version 1. GP Results indicate
that GPO 2 was applied to UserA, however, in the published applications it
shows version 1, and winning GPO = GPO 1. Enforcing gpo 2 does not help.
Could someone explain why the fact that version 2 is mandatory upgrade for
version 1 is ignored? and, further, why assigning version 2 makes assigned
version 1?
thanks,
Vadim Rapp