[Update] Seamonkey 1.0.3

  • Thread starter Thread starter Laurie
  • Start date Start date
L

Laurie

Seamonkey 1.0.3 provides :-

* Improved stability
* Several security fixes
* A bug was introduced in SeaMonkey 1.0.2 that sometimes caused the
URL bar to stop working properly when switching tabs. This has been
fixed. (Bug 332874)
* If you have more bookmarks on your personal toolbar than there is
space for, the ">>" overflow icon will now display more reliably (Bug
338803)
* If you choose to update SeaMonkey when it notifies you that an
update is available, the update page will load in a more useful browser
window (with navigation buttons and toolbars) (Bug 334903)


Available for download at :-

http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/releases/

Laurie
 
what a disgrace!!!... Seamonkey (that was mozilla) loads faster than
firefox!

Firefox primary goal was to be different from mozilla in that it would be
lite and speedy.. but slowly it became monsterous than its ancestor!
 
| what a disgrace!!!... Seamonkey (that was mozilla) loads faster than
| firefox!
|
| Firefox primary goal was to be different from mozilla in that it would be
| lite and speedy.. but slowly it became monsterous than its ancestor!


hahahaha - true

fortunately there's Opera :)

k
 
what a disgrace!!!... Seamonkey (that was mozilla) loads faster
than firefox!
Click to expand...

Not on my machine. The difference isn't much, but Firefox loads a
little faster.
 
how many extensions?
Click to expand...

None, of course. You weren't using extensions' load times to conclude
that Firefox itself is "a disgace" and "monsterous"[sic], were you? I
thought you had mostly given up trolling.
 
thought you had mostly given up trolling.

Now I am absolutly sure of it.

You Corliss and Al Klein are the SAME PERSON!



»Q« said:
how many extensions?
Click to expand...

None, of course. You weren't using extensions' load times to conclude
that Firefox itself is "a disgace" and "monsterous"[sic], were you? I
thought you had mostly given up trolling.
Click to expand...
 
»Q« said:
<
what a disgrace!!!... Seamonkey (that was mozilla) loads
faster than firefox!

Not on my machine. The difference isn't much, but Firefox
loads a little faster.

how many extensions?
Click to expand...

None, of course. You weren't using extensions' load times to
conclude that Firefox itself is "a disgace" and
"monsterous"[sic], were you? I thought you had mostly given up
trolling.
Click to expand...

Now I am absolutly sure of it.

You Corliss and Al Klein are the SAME PERSON!
Click to expand...

That didn't answer the question. Did you really use extensions' load
times as the basis for your inflammatory remarks? If so, why other
than to troll?
 
And the cheetah beats them all. Lynx is not a serious competitor. Far
too many limitations and far too few features.
Click to expand...

Speak for yourself. It's small, snappy even on a 20K dial-up, and pretty
much ad-proof. I get through the morning headlines much faster with Lynx
than with any GUI browser.
 
Hello Q...
Did you really use extensions' load
times as the basis for your inflammatory remarks?
Click to expand...

no, of course not.. I was just asking if you had extensions loaded.. thats
all...

I am not truly insulting firefox.. its just getting too slow for my taste...
I still use it, and it is better than opera and seamonkey in my opinion.
For my main browser I use AvantBrowser that is a good shell for IE.


»Q« said:
»Q« said:
<
<
what a disgrace!!!... Seamonkey (that was mozilla) loads
faster than firefox!

Not on my machine. The difference isn't much, but Firefox
loads a little faster.

how many extensions?

None, of course. You weren't using extensions' load times to
conclude that Firefox itself is "a disgace" and
"monsterous"[sic], were you? I thought you had mostly given up
trolling.
Click to expand...

Now I am absolutly sure of it.

You Corliss and Al Klein are the SAME PERSON!
Click to expand...

That didn't answer the question. Did you really use extensions' load
times as the basis for your inflammatory remarks? If so, why other
than to troll?
Click to expand...
 
Not on my machine. The difference isn't much, but Firefox loads a
little faster.
Click to expand...

Awhile ago, in a thread I compared FF load times with you, I was on W98SE
on a P166, FF 1.02 loaded in about 3 seconds or less, now on W2K, 2.5 GHZ,
FF 1.501 loads in 1 second or less, PrefBar is only extension.

Mike Sa
 
clean your prefetch




ms said:
Awhile ago, in a thread I compared FF load times with you, I was on W98SE
on a P166, FF 1.02 loaded in about 3 seconds or less, now on W2K, 2.5 GHZ,
FF 1.501 loads in 1 second or less, PrefBar is only extension.

Mike Sa
Click to expand...
 
ms said:
Awhile ago, in a thread I compared FF load times with you, I was
on W98SE on a P166, FF 1.02 loaded in about 3 seconds or less, now
on W2K, 2.5 GHZ, FF 1.501 loads in 1 second or less, PrefBar is
only extension.
Click to expand...

1.5.0.5 load for me in about 1.5 seconds, with no extensions, WinXP SP2
home, 2133MHz.
 
Back
Top