(UniBlue) SpyEraser 1.1 - PC Mag says "forget it"

  • Thread starter Thread starter Duh_OZ
  • Start date Start date
D

Duh_OZ

On the UniBlue award page it shows "ZDNet Editors Choice".

The latest review isn't too glowing :0)

Snip:
SpyEraser is a danger to itself and to others. It's poor at removing
existing spyware, sometimes killing innocent processes, and it's even
worse at keeping systems from getting infected in the first place.
Look elsewhere for spyware protection.

Full review:
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,2091004,00.asp
 
Duh_OZ said:
On the UniBlue award page it shows "ZDNet Editors Choice".

The latest review isn't too glowing :0)

Snip:
SpyEraser is a danger to itself and to others. It's poor at removing
existing spyware, sometimes killing innocent processes, and it's even
worse at keeping systems from getting infected in the first place.
Look elsewhere for spyware protection.

Full review:
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,2091004,00.asp
Click to expand...

In order to get a Good rating by PC Magazine, UniBlue Systems have to pay to
advertise in the magazine.

Any rating of software by PC Magazine is biased towards the amount of
advertising space purchased on a long term basis.
 
On the UniBlue award page it shows "ZDNet Editors Choice".

The latest review isn't too glowing :0)

Snip:
SpyEraser is a danger to itself and to others. It's poor at removing
existing spyware, sometimes killing innocent processes, and it's even
worse at keeping systems from getting infected in the first place.
Look elsewhere for spyware protection.

Full review:
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,2091004,00.asp
Click to expand...

Ouch


--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - V2.2
web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk - email:
(e-mail address removed)
Pad: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml
 
Back
Top