unhandled exception address of Error?

[mtczx232]

when unhandled error occur on my customer. how i can get the address of
error,
like we do on C or Pascal (At 0000:C234)?

 

[Barry Kelly]

when unhandled error occur on my customer. how i can get the address of
error,
like we do on C or Pascal (At 0000:C234)?

The stack trace includes the method that caused the error. If you ship a
pdb file with the executable, you can get line number information too.

-- Barry

 

[mtczx232]

is very interst to see .NET vs Java. in java i see that debug info
stored in
the class file itself (isn't it?)

after all, now i think that if i not save track after version, the line
number
not help me.

what you think?

 

[Barry Kelly]

is very interst to see .NET vs Java. in java i see that debug info
stored in
the class file itself (isn't it?)

Well, the stack trace is in Java too, but it is similar: if you want
file names and line numbers, then you need to compile with -g (but you
can toggle line numbers, etc).

after all, now i think that if i not save track after version, the line
number
not help me.

what you think?

I'm sorry, I don't understand this question. Trace after version? With
an old-style error address, you'd need the exact same executable with
the exact same source - so the version issues haven't changed. The fact
that we now have stack traces through Exception.StackTrace means you
have more data than back in the old days of error addresses.

-- Barry

 

[mtczx232]

you are correct, that what I'm try to say, that now I realize it.