G
Guest
I’m running XPe with use and IDE EWF overlay (protected disk, overlaying to a
disk). I ran some rudimentary soak tests on the drive. All that was happening
was a little app started and read and wrote to the drive, after 5 mins the
power was pulled from the machine, 30 seconds later the power was put back.
This was repeated for 10 days, unsurprisingly at the end of the 10 days the
machines were starting to complain about corrupt hard disks, I issued the
command “ewfmgr c: -restore†and all the error disappeared. So far as I
expected, but then I too the disk out of the terminal and put it into my
development pc and ran chkdsk. This is where I got a little confused, chkdsk
reported that it was deleting “corrupt attribute records†and also that it
was “recovering orphaned filesâ€, it also told me that it corrected errors in
the MFT and in the “volume bitmapâ€.
These errors were not on the disk before the testing started, (chkdsk was
run before I started), so how is the disk being corrupted when ewf should be
protecting it? Or do I simply misunderstand the errors that I’m reading?
Thanks for any help,
Rob
disk). I ran some rudimentary soak tests on the drive. All that was happening
was a little app started and read and wrote to the drive, after 5 mins the
power was pulled from the machine, 30 seconds later the power was put back.
This was repeated for 10 days, unsurprisingly at the end of the 10 days the
machines were starting to complain about corrupt hard disks, I issued the
command “ewfmgr c: -restore†and all the error disappeared. So far as I
expected, but then I too the disk out of the terminal and put it into my
development pc and ran chkdsk. This is where I got a little confused, chkdsk
reported that it was deleting “corrupt attribute records†and also that it
was “recovering orphaned filesâ€, it also told me that it corrected errors in
the MFT and in the “volume bitmapâ€.
These errors were not on the disk before the testing started, (chkdsk was
run before I started), so how is the disk being corrupted when ewf should be
protecting it? Or do I simply misunderstand the errors that I’m reading?
Thanks for any help,
Rob