Becky
Webmistress
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2003
- Messages
- 7,424
- Reaction score
- 1,511
Which? Magazine has recently conducted a UK-wide study to see which urban areas in the UK have the best and worst 4G coverage. Out of 20 urban areas, Middlesbrough came out top, and our nation's capital came a lowly 16th place. The study also looked at available 4G download speeds, in which Stoke-on-Trent was the fastest and Brighton/Hove was the slowest. Here's more:
Read more here.
Middlesbrough topped the table with 83% availability for mobile users seeking 4G coverage, ahead of Sheffield, Sunderland, Leicester and Leeds. Bournemouth came bottom with 67.5% availability, behind Southampton and Portsmouth, Cardiff and Nottingham. London was ranked just 16th of the 20 cities studied.
The study comes a few months after a damning government reportfound Britain’s 4G mobile coverage severely lagged behind peers such as Japan and the US. The report, which was by the infrastructure watchdog the National Infrastructure Commission (NIC), ranked the UK 54th in the world.
Read more here.