R
Retired
Is Vista a step backwards? I don't need all of these UAC controls. For many
years now I have gotten along just fine with few hindrances to efficiency.
Now Vista comes along and I can't get hardly anything done because of this
over-controlling UAC concept and other ridiculous permission junk.
If I want to uninstall or delete something, I don't want the system telling
me no! I am capable of fixing any mistakes I might make.
When I installed XP for the first time, it was a learning experience, and I
had to seek out some new device drivers, but right out of the box I was able
to do good solid computer tasks. Not so with Vista. UAC and other Vista
schemes really, really get in the way. Microsoft should leave it up to the
computer user to set up his/her own protection, There are plenty of great
anti-virus and anti-spyware programs out there, and some of the good ones
are free. So why is UAC needed? It's a wonder that Microsoft didn't build
Norton into Vista!
years now I have gotten along just fine with few hindrances to efficiency.
Now Vista comes along and I can't get hardly anything done because of this
over-controlling UAC concept and other ridiculous permission junk.
If I want to uninstall or delete something, I don't want the system telling
me no! I am capable of fixing any mistakes I might make.
When I installed XP for the first time, it was a learning experience, and I
had to seek out some new device drivers, but right out of the box I was able
to do good solid computer tasks. Not so with Vista. UAC and other Vista
schemes really, really get in the way. Microsoft should leave it up to the
computer user to set up his/her own protection, There are plenty of great
anti-virus and anti-spyware programs out there, and some of the good ones
are free. So why is UAC needed? It's a wonder that Microsoft didn't build
Norton into Vista!