E
Eric
I have been using an Epson 870 Photo since they were introduced and been
pleased. I am concerned about light and dark fastness issues. I see the r800
has good archival qualities, but am not sure without having the light cyan and
light magenta, would be any great improvement over a 2200, my other
consideration. The 2200 has good archival qualities, has the "traditional"
Epson photo colors, and prints in a larger format. I see on Red River Paper's
website, they feel a larger version of the r800 will hit the U.S. (Epson denies
this to me). Is there really an improvement in "Photographic" print quality
with this new...5700 dpi, 1.5 picoliter...and so on printer?
Thanks for any and all input.
Eric
pleased. I am concerned about light and dark fastness issues. I see the r800
has good archival qualities, but am not sure without having the light cyan and
light magenta, would be any great improvement over a 2200, my other
consideration. The 2200 has good archival qualities, has the "traditional"
Epson photo colors, and prints in a larger format. I see on Red River Paper's
website, they feel a larger version of the r800 will hit the U.S. (Epson denies
this to me). Is there really an improvement in "Photographic" print quality
with this new...5700 dpi, 1.5 picoliter...and so on printer?
Thanks for any and all input.
Eric