F
Frank B
It is obvious the same questions are asked dozens of times
in these newsgroups, and in just this newsgroup, with
there now being 500 pages, it is a bit tedious just
thinking about going through 500 pages to see if my
question has already been answered somewhere.
So, the obvious question is: "Why don't you have
a "Search" featue?" But, I won't ask the obvious question
because I know you know it would be nice to have, but you
must have decided against having one. Therefore, the
question I will ask is: "Why did you decide against
providing a "Search" feature?"
In advance of your answer: I am very red-faced when you
tell me there is one, and how to find it.
Thanks, and best wishes.... Frank
PS: If anyone who reads this has the same question, and
in keeping with current lack of a "Search" feature, maybe
it is appropriate for you to repost this question under
your name.
in these newsgroups, and in just this newsgroup, with
there now being 500 pages, it is a bit tedious just
thinking about going through 500 pages to see if my
question has already been answered somewhere.
So, the obvious question is: "Why don't you have
a "Search" featue?" But, I won't ask the obvious question
because I know you know it would be nice to have, but you
must have decided against having one. Therefore, the
question I will ask is: "Why did you decide against
providing a "Search" feature?"
In advance of your answer: I am very red-faced when you
tell me there is one, and how to find it.
Thanks, and best wishes.... Frank
PS: If anyone who reads this has the same question, and
in keeping with current lack of a "Search" feature, maybe
it is appropriate for you to repost this question under
your name.